Vertaling van "trials for conducting " (Nederlands → Frans) :

The number of early phase trials is per capita one of the highest in Europe. Since the publication of the guideline trials for conducting explorative studies in Belgium, in mid June 2007, 25 applications for conducting these clinical trials have been submitted to the FAMHP.
The number of early phase trials is per capita one of the highest in Europe. Since the publication of the guideline trials for conducting explorative studies in Belgium, in mid June 2007, 25 applications for conducting these clinical trials have been submitted to the FAMHP.

list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by
criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews

However, the figures do clearly show that there is a considerable number of early phase trials. There are 7 units in Belgium actively undertaking phase I clinical trials and a number of early phase trials are being conducted in centres where there is expertise in specific clinical areas.
However, the figures do clearly show that there is a considerable number of early phase trials. There are 7 units in Belgium actively undertaking phase I clinical trials and a number of early phase trials are being conducted in centres where there is expertise in specific clinical areas.

A trial against Teva in November 2009 resulted in a jury verdict in favor of Novartis that the compound patent was valid and enforceable, i.e., that there was no inequitable conduct (the jury's verdict on inequitable conduct is advisory only).
Un procès contre Teva s’est terminé en novembre 2009 par une décision en faveur de Novartis, concluant que le brevet de la molécule était valide et exécutoire et que la conduite de la société n’était pas inéquitable (la décision du jury en la matière n'a qu'un caractère consultatif).

In 2005, we participated in an industry-wide effort to improve transparency by creating an online portal, disclosing results from more than 250 000 clinical trials conducted worldwide.
En 2005, nous avons participé à une opération conjointe de tous les acteurs de notre branche en vue d’améliorer la transparence sur les essais cliniques. Un portail Internet a été créé, recensant les résultats de plus de 250’000 essais cliniques conduits à travers le monde.

In December 2009, Tasigna was submitted for US and European regulatory approvals for first-line use in CML after new data from the global ENESTnd trial, the largest head-to-head comparison of a targeted therapy against Glivec ever conducted, showed Tasigna produced faster and deeper responses than Glivec in newly diagnosed CML patients.
Des demandes d’autorisations pour Tasigna ont été déposées en décembre 2009 aux Etats-Unis et dans l’Union européenne en tant que traitement de première intention de la LMC. De nouveaux résultats de l’essai ENESTnd réalisé à l’échelle mondiale, la plus vaste confrontation jamais entreprise entre un traitement ciblé et Glivec, ont montré que Tasigna provoquait des réponses plus rapides et plus profondes que Glivec chez les malades souffrant d'une LMC diagnostiquée récemment.

The European Directive 2001/20, transposed in the law of 7 May 2004, forms the basis for the department’s core tasks: ●● Validating, evaluating and assigning approvals for the conduct of clinical trials (including declarations) ●● Strategic preparation of the associated GCP
The European Directive 2001/20, transposed in the law of 7 May 2004, forms the basis for the department’s core tasks: ●● Validating, evaluating and assigning approvals for the conduct of clinical trials (including declarations) ●● Strategic preparation of the associated GCP

Famvir litigation In February 2010, Novartis and Teva have reached a settlement ending the US patent litigation between them relating to Famvir, a therapy for viral infections, after a trial against Teva in November 2009 resulted in a jury verdict in favor of Novartis that the compound patent was valid and enforceable and an advisory verdict that there was no inequitable conduct.
Litige portant sur Famvir En février 2010, Novartis et Teva sont parvenus à un règlement mettant fin au litige sur le brevet américain qui les opposait dans le cas de Famvir, un traitement des infections virales. Un procès contre Teva, qui s’est terminé en novembre 2009 par un verdict du jury en faveur de Novartis, a conclu que le brevet de la molécule était valide et exécutoire et par un verdict consultatif confirmant que la conduite de la société n’avait pas été inéquitable.

In October 2009, results from the global ENESTnd trial, the largest head-to-head comparison of a targeted therapy against Glivec ever conducted, showed that Tasigna produced faster and deeper responses than Glivec in newly diagnosed CML patients.
En octobre 2009, des résultats de l’essai ENESTnd réalisé à l’échelle mondiale, la plus vaste confrontation jamais entreprise entre un traitement ciblé et Glivec, ont montré que Tasigna provoquait des réponses plus rapides et plus profondes que Glivec chez les malades souffrant d'une LMC apparue récemment.