Vertaling van "trial " (Nederlands → Frans) :

trial 1991) Based on 8 RCT’s ; 4 adequately randomised ( A.R) : Canada 1980 a and b, Malmo I and UK AGE trial 1991, 4 suboptimally randomised (Sub.R) : New York 1963, Two County 1978, Stockholm 1980, Göteborg 1982
Based on 8 RCT’s of fair quality (New York 1963, Malmo I and II, Two County 1978, Canada 1980, Stockholm 1980, Göteborg 1982, UK AGE trial 1991) Based on 8 RCT’s ; 4 adequately randomised ( A.R) : Canada 1980 a and b, Malmo I and UK AGE trial 1991, 4 suboptimally randomised (Sub.R) : New York 1963, Two County 1978, Stockholm 1980, Göteborg 1982

In the course of 2008 there were at least another 99 early phase trials of which 43 trials being carried out for the first time in humans, 164 phase I trials (including those not falling under the definition of an early phase trial), 176 phase II trials and 223 phase III trials. The database currently does not always allow a distinction to be made between early phase trials as defined above and later phases.
In the course of 2008 there were at least another 99 early phase trials of which 43 trials being carried out for the first time in humans, 164 phase I trials (including those not falling under the definition of an early phase trial), 176 phase II trials and 223 phase III trials. The database currently does not always allow a distinction to be made between early phase trials as defined above and later phases.

Table 2: Search for additional RCTs Search Benefit and harms of mammography screening (40-49 y) questions Note Specific search for RCT’s Date 27/04/2010 Keywords Breast neoplasms (MESH), mass screening (or early detection) (MESH), mammography (MESH) Medline 1 Randomized controlled trials/ (66083) Medline (OVID): (OVID): 2 Randomized controlled trial.pt (289038) Filter Filter 3 Random allocation/ (67885) RCT RCT 4 Double blind method/ (105956) 5 Single blind method/ (13834) 6 Clinical trial.pt (460563) 7 exp clinical trial/ (606505) 8 or/1-7 (718664) 9 (clinic$ adj trial$).tw (146686) 10 ((singl$ or doubl$ or treb$ or tripl$) adj (blind$3 or mask$3)).tw (105209) 11 Placebos/ (28712) 12 Placebo$.tw (125428) 13 Randomly allocated.tw (12231) 14 (allocated adj2 random).tw (654) 15 9 or 10 or 11 or 12 or 13 or 14 (312732) 16 8 or 15 (842155) 17 Case report.tw (155883) 18 Letter.pt (688664) 19 Historical article.pt (263287) 20 Review of reported cases.pt (0) 21 Review,multicase.pt (0) 22 17 or 18 or 19 or 20 or 21 (1098644) 23 16 not 22 (822810) 24 Breast/ or Breast Diseases/ (30717) 25 Neoplasms/ (216644) 26 24 and 25 (535) 27 (breast$ adj5 neoplasm$).tw (1588) 28 (breast$ adj5 cancer$).tw (135654) 29 (breast$ adj5 carcin$).tw (31778) 30 (breast$ adj5 tumo$).tw (23438) 31 (breast$ adj5 metasta$).tw (16580) 32 (breast$ adj5 malig$).tw (7361) 33 exp Breast Neoplasms/ (171606) 34 exp Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/ (8460) 35 26 or 27 or 28 or 29 or 30 or 31 or 32 or 33 or 34 (207174) 36 mammography.mp (23598) 37 screening.mp (274211) 38 36 or 37 (288429) 39 23 and 35 and 38 (2326) 40 limit 39 to (yr=" 2008 -Current" and " all adult (19 plus years)" and (dutch or english or french)) (241) 41 from 40 keep 1-241 (241) 42 from 41 keep 1-241 (241) CENTRAL Breast neoplasms (MESH) and early detection (MESH) or 61 mammography (MESH) (manual limit 2008-2010) in title , abstracts or key words
Table 4: Search for additional RCTs Search Benefit and harms of mammography screening (40-49 y) questions Note Specific search for RCT’s Date 27/04/2010 Keywords Breast neoplasms (MESH), mass screening (or early detection) (MESH), mammography (MESH) Medline 1 Randomized controlled trials/ (66083) Medline (OVID): (OVID): 2 Randomized controlled trial.pt (289038) Filter Filter 3 Random allocation/ (67885) RCT RCT 4 Double blind method/ (105956) 5 Single blind method/ (13834) 6 Clinical trial.pt (460563) 7 exp clinical trial/ (606505) 8 or/1-7 (718664) 9 (clinic$ adj trial$).tw (146686) 10 ((singl$ or doubl$ or treb$ or tripl$) adj (blind$3 or mask$3)).tw (105209) 11 Placebos/ (28712) 12 Placebo$.tw (125428) 13 Randomly allocated.tw (12231) 14 (allocated adj2 random).tw (654) 15 9 or 10 or 11 or 12 or 13 or 14 (312732) 16 8 or 15 (842155) 17 Case report.tw (155883) 18 Letter.pt (688664) 19 Historical article.pt (263287) 20 Review of reported cases.pt (0) 21 Review,multicase.pt (0) 22 17 or 18 or 19 or 20 or 21 (1098644) 23 16 not 22 (822810) 24 Breast/ or Breast Diseases/ (30717) 25 Neoplasms/ (216644) 26 24 and 25 (535) 27 (breast$ adj5 neoplasm$).tw (1588) 28 (breast$ adj5 cancer$).tw (135654) 29 (breast$ adj5 carcin$).tw (31778) 30 (breast$ adj5 tumo$).tw (23438) 31 (breast$ adj5 metasta$).tw (16580) 32 (breast$ adj5 malig$).tw (7361) 33 exp Breast Neoplasms/ (171606) 34 exp Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/ (8460) 35 26 or 27 or 28 or 29 or 30 or 31 or 32 or 33 or 34 (207174) 36 mammography.mp (23598) 37 screening.mp (274211) 38 36 or 37 (288429) 39 23 and 35 and 38 (2326) 40 limit 39 to (yr=" 2008 -Current" and " all adult (19 plus years)" and (dutch or english or french)) (241) 41 from 40 keep 1-241 (241) 42 from 41 keep 1-241 (241) CENTRAL Breast neoplasms (MESH) and early detection (MESH) or 61 mammography (MESH) (manual limit 2008-2010) in title , abstracts or key words

The Clinical Trial Facilitation Group (CTFG) is a collaborative effort to facilitate and harmonise clinical trials in Europe. Within the CTFG agreements have been made for various competent authorities to voluntarily arrive at a common evaluation for applications for clinical trials whenever this involves multicentre trials with participating centres from different Member States.
The Clinical Trial Facilitation Group (CTFG) is a collaborative effort to facilitate and harmonise clinical trials in Europe. Within the CTFG agreements have been made for various competent authorities to voluntarily arrive at a common evaluation for applications for clinical trials whenever this involves multicentre trials with participating centres from different Member States.

The number of early phase trials is per capita one of the highest in Europe. Since the publication of the guideline trials for conducting explorative studies in Belgium, in mid June 2007, 25 applications for conducting these clinical trials have been submitted to the FAMHP.
The number of early phase trials is per capita one of the highest in Europe. Since the publication of the guideline trials for conducting explorative studies in Belgium, in mid June 2007, 25 applications for conducting these clinical trials have been submitted to the FAMHP.

However, the figures do clearly show that there is a considerable number of early phase trials. There are 7 units in Belgium actively undertaking phase I clinical trials and a number of early phase trials are being conducted in centres where there is expertise in specific clinical areas.
However, the figures do clearly show that there is a considerable number of early phase trials. There are 7 units in Belgium actively undertaking phase I clinical trials and a number of early phase trials are being conducted in centres where there is expertise in specific clinical areas.

In 2008, there was a significant increase observed in the number of applications for clinical trials and amendments (changes to an existing file) and of the percentage of phase I trials. The absolute number of non-commercial (“academic”) trials remained stable.
In 2008, there was a significant increase observed in the number of applications for clinical trials and amendments (changes to an existing file) and of the percentage of phase I trials. The absolute number of non-commercial (“academic”) trials remained stable.

Encouraging clinical trials and the inherent evaluation of applications for these trials, as well as the creation of a scientific subgroup for oncology, means that the FAMHP will need to have the necessary autonomy to attract the essential expertise for this relatively complex domain from the point of concept of innovative medicines.
Encouraging clinical trials and the inherent evaluation of applications for these trials, as well as the creation of a scientific subgroup for oncology, means that the FAMHP will need to have the necessary autonomy to attract the essential expertise for this relatively complex domain from the point of concept of innovative medicines.

controlled trial without randomization double blind double blind randomised placebo controlled trial economic evaluation evaluation guidelines
case series cross-sectional study controlled trial without randomization double blind double blind randomised placebo controlled trial economic evaluation evaluation guidelines

One striking point is the clear trend towards an increasing number of phase I trials, from 17% in 2004 to 24% in 2007, as well as the increase in the number of submitted academic clinical trials: from 3% in 2004 to 7% in 2007.
One striking point is the clear trend towards an increasing number of phase I trials, from 17% in 2004 to 24% in 2007, as well as the increase in the number of submitted academic clinical trials: from 3% in 2004 to 7% in 2007.