Les experts en la matière nous ont expliqué que l'arrêt des personnes visait à résoudre des contradictions qu'il y avait dans la Constitution même, et c'est ce qui a amené à employer le mot «personne» dans divers contextes, au sein de la Constitution, en réalisant finalement que, dans la Constitution elle-même, le mot devait avoir un sens qui était plus large, qui serait inclusif et qui comprendrait les femmes.
It has been explained to us by those who are experts in the field that the resolution in the persons case was based upon working with inconsistencies within the constitutional document itself and ultimately trying to look at the use of the term “person” in its various contexts within the Constitution, and ultimately coming to the realization that within the Constitution itself it had to have a meaning that was broader, that would be inclusive and would bring women into that fold.