That is his definition of fairness. So the question I am asking him is this: How does the minister explain his refusal to honour his election commitment, as reported in the Globe and Mail, to establish a real minimum tax on corporate profits, when CP, with profits of $422 million, did not pay a single cent in tax?
Alors, je lui pose la question: Comment le ministre explique-t-il son refus de donner suite à son engagement électoral, tel que rapporté par le Globe and Mail, d'établir un réel impôt minimum sur les profits des entreprises rentables, alors que le CP, avec des profits de 422 millions de dollars, n'a pas payé un cent d'impôt?