Traduction de «years after stopping randomized treatment » (Néerlandais → Français) :

Heiss G, Wallace R, Anderson GL et al. Health risks and benefits 3 years after stopping randomized treatment with estrogen and progestin.
Heiss G, Wallace R, Anderson GL et al. Health risks and benefits 3 years after stoppin randomized treatment with estrogen and progestin.

Boutitie F, Pinede L, Schulman S et al. Influence of preceding length of anticoagulant treatment and initial presentation of venous thromboembolism on risk of recurrence after stopping treatment: analysis of individual participant’s data from seven trials.
Oudega R, Van Weert H, Stoffers H et al. NHG-Standaard: Diepe veneuze trombose.

Spontaneous cessation rate: 2.5% OR counselling only: 1.73 Incremental OR NRT gum (relative to counselling only): 1.63 Incremental OR NRT patch (relative to counselling only): 1.79 Incremental OR NRT spray (relative to counselling only): 2.35 Incremental OR NRT inhaler (relative to counselling only): 2.14 Incremental OR bupropion (relative to counselling only): 2.30 % of smokers still under treatment after the first month: 50% (range 40-60% in sensitivity analysis) % of smokers still under treatment after the second month: 20% (range 15-25% in sensitivity analysis) Lifetime relapse probability after one year of abstinence: 35% (range 10-50% in sensitivity analysis) Effect of smoking cessation on mortality derived from the results of the American Cancer Society Prevention Study II. The mortality rate for former smokers was projected by calculating a weighted average of the incremental differentials between mortality rates of neversmokers and smokers, weighted according to the duration of abstinence.
Spontaneous cessation rate: 2.5% OR counselling only: 1.73 Incremental OR NRT gum (relative to counselling only): 1.63 Incremental OR NRT patch (relative to counselling only): 1.79 Incremental OR NRT spray (relative to counselling only): 2.35 Incremental OR NRT inhaler (relative to counselling only): 2.14 Incremental OR Buproprion (relative to counselling only): 2.30 % of smokers still under treatment after the first month: 50% (range 40-60% in sensitivity analysis) % of smokers still under treatment after the second month: 20% (range 15-25% in sensitivity analysis) Lifetime relapse probability after one year of abstinence: 35% (range 10-50% in sensitivity analysis) Effect of smoking cessation on mortality derived from the results of the American Cancer Society Prevention Study II. The mortality rate for former smokers was projected by calculating a weighted average of the incremental differentials between mortality rates of neversmokers and smokers, weighted according to the duration of abstinence.

Reinforcing its efficacy and safety profile, new long-term data from a pivotal fracture trial show Aclasta preserved bone mass in patients who received annual infusions for six years and the risk of new morphometric spine fractures was reduced by 52% when measured as a secondary endpoint compared to those who stopped treatment at three years.
Renforçant son profil d’efficacité et d’innocuité, de nouveaux résultats provenant d’un essai pivot de long terme sur les fractures montrent que Reclast/Aclasta conserve la masse osseuse de malades qui ont reçu une perfusion annuelle pendant six ans. En outre, le risque de nouvelles fractures morphométriques de la colonne vertébrale, mesuré en tant que critère secondaire, a été réduit de 52% par rapport aux malades qui ont arrêté le traitement au bout de trois ans.

In August 2009, “The New England Journal of Medicine” published results from the landmark BIG 1-98 study affirming that the five-year upfront use of Femara after surgery was an optimal treatment approach for postmenopausal women with early-stage, hormonereceptor positive breast cancer.
En août 2009, «The New England Journal of Medicine» a publié les résultats de l’étude pivot BIG 1-98 qui démontrent que l’utilisation de Femara pendant cinq ans après l'intervention chirurgicale constituait une approche optimale chez les femmes postménopausées atteintes d’un cancer du sein hormono-dépendant précoce.

In August, “The New England Journal of Medicine” published results from the landmark BIG 1-98 study affirming the five-year upfront use of Femara after surgery was an optimal treatment approach versus tamoxifen for postmenopausal women with early-stage, hormone-receptor positive breast cancer.
En août, «The New England Journal of Medicine» a publié les résultats de l’étude pivot BIG 1-98 qui démontrent que l’utilisation de Femara pendant cinq ans après l'intervention chirurgicale constituait une approche optimale par rapport au tamoxifène chez les femmes ménopausées atteintes d’un cancer du sein hormonodépendant précoce.