Vertaling van "independent development " (Nederlands → Frans) :

Acknowledgements: Brekelmans C (GGZNederland, NL), Hewson L (Bradford Counseling Service, UK), Kelvin R (Department of Health, UK), Kingsbury S (CAMHS Hertfordshire Partnership Trust, UK), Kutcher S (Dalhousie University, Ca), Leys M (VUB, Be), Menting J (Yulius Mental Health, NL), Minotte P (IWSM, Be), Rees D (Independent Development Consultant, UK), Rietveld AA (Accare Univerity Centre for child and adolescent psychiatry, NL), Van Nuffel R (VVGG, Be), Waddell C (Simon Fraser University, Ca), Wijnands Y (Ministry of Health, Wellbeing and Sports, NL), York A (South West London & St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust, UK), Garcin, V (EPSM Lille-Métropole, FR)
Remerciements: Brekelmans C (GGZNederland, NL), Hewson L (Bradford Counseling Service, UK), Kelvin R (Department of Health, UK), Kingsbury S (CAMHS Hertfordshire Partnership Trust, UK), Kutcher S (Dalhousie University, Ca), Leys M (VUB, Be), Menting J (Yulius Mental Health, NL), Minotte P (IWSM, Be), Rees D (Independent Development Consultant, UK), Rietveld AA (Accare Univerity Centre for child and adolescent psychiatry, NL), Van Nuffel R (VVGG, Be), Waddell C (Simon Fraser University, Ca), Wijnands Y (Ministry of Health, Wellbeing and Sports, NL), York A (South West London & St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust, UK), Garcin, V (EPSM Lille-Métropole, FR)

scope and purpose: 10/12 stakeholders involvement: 8/16 rigour of development: 7/28 (methods available only on request) clarity and presentation: 8/16 applicability: 3/12 editorial independence: 2/8 question: adequate search: insufficient selection: unclear quality appraisal: fair data-extraction: not given characteristics of original studies: not given meta-analysis: no pooling Randomisation: good concealment of allocation: no Blinding of outcome assessors: unclear Baseline characteristics comparable: yes Follow-up: sufficient Intention-to-treat: yes Contamination: unclear
scope and purpose: 10/12 stakeholders involvement: 8/16 rigour of development: 7/28 (methods available only on request) clarity and presentation: 8/16 applicability: 3/12 editorial independence: 2/8 question: adequate search: insufficient selection: unclear quality appraisal: fair data-extraction: not given characteristics of original studies: not given meta-analysis: no pooling

In the same train of thought, a very recent report of the Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, an independent scientific advisory body in the United Kingdom, shows the state of affairs concerning the potential toxicity of caffeine in pregnant women and affirms, with great circumspection, that caffeine is already likely to affect the development of the foetus from a daily consumption of 200 mg (COT, 2008).
Dans le même ordre d’idées, un rapport très récent du Comité de Toxicologie du Royaume-Uni, organisme indépendant de conseil scientifique, fait un nouveau point sur la possible toxicité de la caféine chez la femme enceinte et déclare, avec beaucoup de précautions, qu’il est vraisemblable que la caféine affecte le développement du fœtus déjà pour des apports journaliers de l’ordre de 200 mg (COT, 2008).