Traduction de «Planning-programming-budgeting system » (Néerlandais → Anglais) :

TERMINOLOGIE

planning-programming-budgeting system (besluitvormingssysteem waarin wordt getracht de tekortkomingen van het traditionele budgettaire proces te vermijden) | plannings- en begrotings systeem
Planning-Programming-Budgeting System

planning-programming-budgeting system
Planning-Programming-Budgeting System

budgettaire prioriteit [ ABB | activiteitgestuurd begroten | BFOR | planning-programming-budgeting system | plannings- en begrotings systeem | PPBS | prestatiebegroting | prestatiegericht begroten | rationalisatie van de budgettaire prioriteiten | resultaatgericht begroten | resultaatgerichte begroting ]
programme budgeting [ ABB | activity-based budgeting | BFOR | budget focused on results | PBB | performance-based budgeting | performance budgeting | planning, programming and budgeting system | PPBS | rationalisation of budget choices | RBB | result-based budgeting ]

TRADUCTIONS EN CONTEXTE

Deze stonden in de jaren 1960 onder president Johnson aan de basis van het “Planning, Programming and Budgeting System” en onder president Carter ontstond daaruit het model “BBZ”, oftewel “budget base zero” – de ideologie van begrotingsprestaties, die achtereenvolgens ook in Nieuw-Zeeland, het Verenigd Koninkrijk, in 2001 in Frankrijk, met zijn organieke begrotingswetten, en in 2006 zelfs in Mexico werd ingevoerd.
It was this that gave the US the Planning, Programming and Budgeting System in the 1960s under the Johnson Presidency, and that under President Carter gave the BBZ, or budget base zero – the budgetary performance ideology that subsequently spread to New Zealand, the United Kingdom, France in 2001 with its organic law on finance laws, and even Mexico in 2006.

Deze stonden in de jaren 1960 onder president Johnson aan de basis van het “Planning, Programming and Budgeting System ” en onder president Carter ontstond daaruit het model “BBZ”, oftewel “budget base zero ” – de ideologie van begrotingsprestaties, die achtereenvolgens ook in Nieuw-Zeeland, het Verenigd Koninkrijk, in 2001 in Frankrijk, met zijn organieke begrotingswetten, en in 2006 zelfs in Mexico werd ingevoerd.
It was this that gave the US the Planning, Programming and Budgeting System in the 1960s under the Johnson Presidency, and that under President Carter gave the BBZ, or budget base zero – the budgetary performance ideology that subsequently spread to New Zealand, the United Kingdom, France in 2001 with its organic law on finance laws, and even Mexico in 2006.

In view of this assessment and taking into account the policy invitations addressed to Romania to correct the excessive deficit under Article 104(7) of the Treaty (see below), as well as to ensure sustainable convergence, Romania is invited to: (i) ensure the correction of the excessive deficit by 2011; to this effect, implement the fiscal measures as planned in the February 2009 budget and the April 2009 amended budget, especially in the area of public sector wages and pension reform; take further corrective action if needed to achieve the 2009 deficit target in order to ensure compliance with the commitments undertaken under the balance of payments programme; and specify measures to buttress the envisaged reduction of the deficit in 2010 and 2011, in particular those underpinning the planned reduction of the public wage bill; (ii) undertake concrete steps towards the envisaged strengthening of fiscal governance and transparency, in particular by setting up a binding medium-term budgetary framework, establishing an independent fiscal council, introducing limits on budgetary revisions during the year and laying-out fiscal rules as well as restructuring the public compensation system, including pay and bonuses; (iii) accelerate the reform of pension (in particular with respect to the indexation of pensions and the retirement age) and health care systems to curb the substantial increase in age-related expenditures and reduce the risks to the sustainability of public finances; and (iv) strengthen the supply side of the economy by making tangible progress with the implementation of the structural reforms, notably by enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of public administration, improving the business environment, tackling undeclared work and by increasing the absorption and improving the use of EU funds.
In view of this assessment and taking into account the policy invitations addressed to Romania to correct the excessive deficit under Article 104(7) of the Treaty (see below), as well as to ensure sustainable convergence, and in line with the economic policy measures envisaged under the economic programme supported by Community balance-of-payments assistance, Romania is invited to: (i) ensure the correction of the excessive deficit by 2011; to this effect, implement the fiscal measures as planned in the February 2009 budget and the April 2009 amended budget, especially in the area of public sector wages and pension reform; take further corrective action if needed to achieve the 2009 deficit target in order to ensure compliance with the commitments undertaken under the programme supported by EC balance of payments assistance; and specify measures to buttress the envisaged reduction of the deficit in 2010 and 2011, in particular those underpinning the planned reduction of the public wage bill; (ii) undertake concrete steps towards the envisaged strengthening of fiscal governance and transparency, in particular by setting up a binding medium-term budgetary framework, establishing an independent fiscal council, introducing limits on budgetary revisions during the year and laying-out fiscal rules as well as restructuring the public compensation system, including pay and bonuses; in the area of tax administration, improve the efficiency of revenue collection through the reform of tax administration and a broadening of the tax base; (iii) accelerate the reform of the pension system (in particular with respect to the indexation of pensions and the retirement age) to curb the substantial increase in age-related expenditures and reduce the risks to the sustainability of public finances and improve the effectiveness and efficiency of healthcare spending; and (iv) strengthen the supply side of the economy by making tangible progress with the implementation of the structu ...

Het strategisch programmerings- en planningsysteem (SPP : Strategic Programming and Planning) en activiteitsgestuurd beheer (ABM : Activity Based Management), naast activiteitsgerichte budgettering (ABB : Activity Based Budgeting), die in 2000 met het witboek over de zogenaamde hervorming-Kinnock ingevoerd zijn, proberen de toestand te verhelpen door fundamentele veranderingen aan te brengen in de manier waarop de EU-instellingen de verschillende beleidsonderdelen (de beleidsdoelstellingen die verwezenlijkt moeten worden) omschrijven, ordenen en evalueren, en duidelijk de totaal benodigde middelen (operationele en administratieve) vastleggen.
The Strategic Programming and Planning (SPP) system and Activity Based Management (ABM), as well as Activity Based Budgeting (ABB), which were introduced following the White paper on the so-called Kinnock reform in 2000, all sought to remedy this situation by fundamentally changing the way EU Institutions identify, prioritise and evaluate the various policies (political objectives to achieve) and clearly identify the overall resources (operational + administrative) needed. Basically, the improvements aimed for can be summarised as follows: