R. c. Furtney, [1991] 3 R.C.S. 89. La Cour a statué que la réglementation des activités de jeu présentait des aspects doubles, certains aspects étant de compétence provinciale manifeste, sous réserve de la règle de la compétence prépondérante du Parlement issue de la jurisprudence et selon laquelle il faut trancher en faveur de la compétence fédérale en cas de conflit entre la loi fédérale et la loi provinciale.
R. v. Furtney, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 89. It should also be noted that the Court found that regulation of gaming establishments was an area that had “dual aspects,” with some aspects being clearly under provincial jurisdiction, as well as being subject to the rule of federal paramountcy developed by the courts in Canada, under which any conflict in an area of dual aspect is to be decided in favour of federal jurisdiction.