S'il est vrai que vous n'avez pas de preuves scientifiques de cette incidence, ne devrait-on pas appliquer le principe de la prudence—que vous avez évoqué, madame—et ne plus agrandir ou ouvrir de pisciculture avant d'avoir des preuves qu'il y a ou non une incidence et pouvoir le dire aux gens?
If that's correct, if you don't have the science to back up the evidence that it may or may not affect, wouldn't the precautionary principle—which, madam, you mentioned—apply, and there would be no further expansion or new development of an aquaculture open-net-cage finfish farm until you have the evidence to say to these people, yes, it does, or no, it doesn't have an impact?