Boost Your Productivity!Translate documents (Ms-Word, Ms-Excel, ...) faster and better thanks to artificial intelligence!

Traduction de «senator oliver which would cost $140 » (Anglais → Français) :

Senator De Bané: To make it clear, we have two options here: The one that we are proposing, which will represent a shortfall of $25 million to the treasury; and the one put forward now by Senator Oliver, which would cost $140 million.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/ (...) (...) [HTML] [2014-09-03]

Le sénateur De Bané: Que ce soit clair, il y a deux solutions: celle que nous proposons, qui représentera un manque à gagner de 25 millions de dollars pour le Trésor et celle que propose maintenant le sénateur Oliver et qui coûterait 140 millions de dollars.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/ (...) (...) [HTML] [2014-09-03]

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/ (...) [HTML] [2014-09-03]

Senator Oliver: Which would be?

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/ (...) (...) [HTML] [2014-09-03]

Le sénateur Oliver : Ce qui serait à quel moment?

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/ (...) (...) [HTML] [2014-09-03]

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/ (...) [HTML] [2014-09-03]

If I take your analysis here, Senator Oliver's income of $140,000 to $150,000 and his debt-to-asset ratio, which would be a percentage of the cost of the duplex, does not seem to be taken into consideration — that is, the fact that there is an income that comes into the picture.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/content/ (...) (...) [HTML] [2014-09-01]

Si nous reprenons ici les éléments de votre analyse, le revenu du sénateur Oliver, qui est de 140 000 à 150 000 $, et son ratio dette-actifs, qui serait un pourcentage du coût du duplex, ne semblent pas entrer en considération — c'est-à-dire que le fait qu'il perçoit un revenu n'est pas pris en compte.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/content/ (...) (...) [HTML] [2014-09-01]

http://www.parl.gc.ca/content/ (...) [HTML] [2014-09-01]

Hon. Jack Austin (Leader of the Government): Honourable senators, while I am on my feet, I would like to respond to a question by Senator Oliver, which was asked on May 11 with respect to gas taxes and the question of when the Competition Bureau would be able to act.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/ (...) (...) [HTML] [2004-05-12]

L'honorable Jack Austin (leader du gouvernement) : Honorables sénateurs, pendant que j'ai la parole, j'aimerais répondre à la question posée le 11 mai dernier par le sénateur Oliver qui voulait savoir quand le Bureau de la concurrence pourrait intervenir dans cette affaire.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/ (...) (...) [HTML] [2004-05-12]

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/ (...) [HTML] [2004-05-12]

Senator Oliver: You would need to go on and look at various types of weapons to determine which would make the risk higher, would you not?

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/ (...) (...) [HTML]

Le sénateur Oliver : Il faudrait donc tenir compte des divers types d'armes utilisées pour savoir si cela aggrave le risque, n'est-ce pas?

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/ (...) (...) [HTML]

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/ (...) [HTML]

D'autres ont cherché : senator senator oliver proposing which which would which would cost would cost $140 senator oliver which analysis here senator debt-to-asset ratio which cost income of $140 honourable senators would determine which you would senator oliver which would cost $140

datacenter (1): www.wordscope.be (v4.0.br)

'senator oliver which would cost $140' ->

Date index: 2025-06-29