And in that case, does he not realize that what his Minister of Canadian Heritage did is even more serious, because, in addition to being a member of Cabinet, he is the Minister responsible for the CRTC and as such was supposed to protect the CRTC against undue interference from his four colleagues?
Mais si elle est grave, est-ce qu'il ne voit pas que celle de son ministre du Patrimoine est doublement grave, puisqu'en plus d'être membre du Cabinet, il est le ministre protecteur du CRTC, et qu'en cette qualité c'est lui qui devait protéger le CRTC contre les interventions indues de ses quatre collègues?