The member claimed that the unauthorized use of her picture in a visual impact study included in the report had violated her privacy, was an assault on her dignity as an individual and as a member of the House, had opened her up to ridicule and had stereotyped her in a manner that misrepresented who she was and thus could impede her ability to perform her duties as a member of Parliament.
La députée a soutenu que l'utilisation de sa photo sans autorisation dans une étude sur l'impact visuel intégrée au rapport violait sa vie privée, portait atteinte à sa dignité comme personne et comme députée, l'exposait au ridicule et donnait d'elle, en en faisant un stéréotype, une fausse image qui est susceptible de lui nuire dans l'exercice de ses fonctions de députée.