Vertaling van "further detail could " (Engels → Frans) :

21. Stresses the importance for the committee and for the agricultural sector of pilot projects, such as the European Price Monitoring Observatory, in order to improve price comparability and transparency in setting food prices, and calls for continued support; proposes, at the same time, the launching of further pilot projects that could help improve the marketing and visibility of European agricultural products, such as new promotion campaigns to enhance awareness among schoolchildren of the EU quality schemes; calls on the Commission to keep Parliament and the Council regularly informed about the use of this instrument and the relevant findings, while ensuring that the relevant details are also made available to a wider public; emphasises the importance of a pilot project in which obstructions to farming businesses arising from the accumulation of legislation are investigated;
21. souligne l'importance pour la commission et le secteur agricole des projets pilotes, comme l'observatoire européen de surveillance des prix, afin de permettre une meilleure comparaison des prix ainsi qu'une meilleure transparence dans l'établissement des prix alimentaires et demande qu'ils continuent à bénéficier d'un soutien; propose, en parallèle, de lancer des projets pilotes supplémentaires en mesure d'améliorer la commercialisation et la visibilité des produits agricoles de l'Union européenne, comme de nouvelles campagnes promotionnelles destinées à sensibiliser davantage les jeunes élèves aux programmes de qualité de l'Union européenne; demande à la Commission d'informer régulièrement le Parlement et le Conseil des activités et des conclusions de cet instrument, tout en veillant à ce que ces informations fassent l'objet de la diffusion la plus large possible auprès du public; insiste sur l'importance d'un projet pilote qui examine les obstacles que l'excès de législation impose aux exploitations agricoles;

When you talk about integrating nurses into the system, could you explain in greater detail how they could be integrated further into the current model so that they could reduce the burden on the overall system and we could maximize the services they are able to provide?
Lorsque vous parlez d'intégrer les infirmières au système, pourriez-vous nous expliquer plus en détail comment elles pourraient être mieux intégrées dans le modèle actuel pour leur permettre de réduire la charge de l'ensemble du système, et pourriez-vous nous dire comment nous pourrions maximiser les services qu'elles sont en mesure d'assurer?

6. Believes that the separate mapping of data according to type of fishing activity, such as small-scale fishing, traditional fishing or industrial fishing, would provide a more realistic picture of the diversity of fisheries; further emphasises that if socio-economic indicators relating to fishing (e.g. age and training of crew members) were made available, they could help provide a more detailed description of the sector;
6. estime que la cartographie séparée des données en fonction du type d'activité de pêche (pêche côtière et artisanale, pêche traditionnelle ou pêche industrielle) offrirait une vision plus réaliste de la diversité des pêcheries; souligne en outre que la fourniture d'indicateurs socioéconomiques relatifs à la pêche (par exemple, âge et formation de l'équipage) pourrait contribuer à une caractérisation plus détaillée du secteur;

11. Believes that the concept of ‘acting in concert’ is essential when calculating the threshold that triggers the launch of a mandatory bid, and understands that Member States have transposed the definition provided for in the Directive differently; believes, however, that focusing on changes to the concept of ‘acting in concert’ solely within the Directive would fall short of enhancing legal certainty, as this concept is also relevant for other calculations required under EU company law; suggests, therefore, that a more detailed analysis is undertaken in order to identify possible means by which the concept of ‘acting in concert’ could be further clarified and harmonised;
11. estime que la notion de "personnes agissant de concert" est essentielle lorsqu'il s'agit de calculer le seuil qui déclenche le lancement d'une offre obligatoire, et croit savoir que les États membres ont transposé la définition de la directive de façons différentes; considère toutefois que le fait de se concentrer sur la modification de la notion de "personnes agissant de concert" dans la seule directive ne permettrait pas de renforcer la sécurité juridique, étant donné que cette notion est également utilisée pour d'autres calculs exigés dans le cadre du droit des sociétés de l'Union; suggère toutefois de procéder à une étude plus détaillée afin d'identifier d'éventuels moyens de clarifier et d'harmoniser davantage la notion de "personnes agissant de concert";

And I'm wondering if there's a little bit of guidance in terms of.I know this is a restrictive area of the bill, the definition section, but is it possible, for future work, that some further detail could be provided on this part in terms of why the ruling was made, and so on?
Et je me demande s'il n'y aurait pas quelques conseils pour ce qui est de.Je sais que l'article des définitions du projet de loi est un article qui est assujetti à certaines restrictions, mais serait-il possible, dans le cadre de travaux futurs, que l'on nous fournisse davantage de détails sur cette partie, afin de nous éclairer sur le pourquoi de la décision, et ainsi de suite?

(Return tabled) Question No. 865 Ms. Kirsty Duncan: With respect to cuts in government funding to newcomer settlement organizations: (a) how does this policy reflect Canada’s commitment to cultural diversity; (b) what, if any, needs assessments of newcomers to Canada have been undertaken over the last five years, if none were undertaken, why not, and of those undertaken, (i) when were they undertaken, (ii) by whom, (iii) what were the results, (iv) what were the chief recommendations; (c) what was the detailed process undertaken to examine funding of newcomer settlement programs, which led to the government's cuts; (d) over the past five years, how much money did the government promise to invest in newcomer settlement services, by province and territory, and what amount was actually invested in newcomer settlement services, by province and territory; (e) how was the decision to cut $53 million from newcomer settlement organizations made, (i) what were all the procedural steps in the decision-making process, (ii) what stakeholders were consulted, (iii) which departments were involved in the decision-making process, (iv) what formulas were used, (v) how was it determined that 85 percent of the cuts were necessary in Ontario; (f) what percentage of the Ontario cuts to newcomer settlement organizations were made in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA); (g) how many newcomers arrived in Canada in each of the last five years, (i) how many newcomers arrived in each of the provinces and territories, (ii) how many people settled in each of the provinces, (iii) how many people settled in each of Canada’s ten largest cities; (h) what information does the government have regarding the movement of newcomers from one province to another or from one city to another in the newcomers' first three years after arrival in Canada; (i) from which countries did the newcomers arrive in each of the last five years and, for each country identified, (i) what are the official languages spoke ...
(Le document est déposé) Question n 865 Mme Kirsty Duncan: En ce qui concerne la réduction des subventions gouvernementales aux organismes d’aide à l’établissement des nouveaux arrivants: a) en quoi cette politique correspond-elle à l’engagement du Canada en faveur de la diversité culturelle; b) a-t-on cherché depuis cinq ans à évaluer les besoins des nouveaux arrivants, si non, pourquoi pas, si oui, (i) quand ces évaluations ont-elles été menées, (ii) qui les a menées, (iii) quels résultats ont-elles donnés, (iv) sur quelles recommandations ont-elles débouché; c) comment s’y est-on pris au juste pour examiner le budget des programmes d’aide à l’établissement des nouveaux arrivants en vue de les réduire; d) depuis cinq ans, combien le gouvernement a-t-il promis d’investir dans les services d’aide à l’établissement des nouveaux arrivants, par province ou territoire, et combien a-t-il effectivement investi dans ces services, par province ou territoire; e) comment a-t-on décidé de réduire de 53 millions de dollars les subventions aux organismes d’aide à l’établissement des nouveaux arrivants, (i) quelles ont été les étapes du processus de décision, (ii) quelles parties prenantes a-t-on consultées, (iii) quels ministères a-t-on associés au processus de décision, (iv) quelles formules a-t-on employées, (v) comment a-t-on établi que 85 p. 100 des réductions étaient nécessaires en Ontario; f) quel pourcentage des réductions de subventions aux organismes d’aide à l’établissement des nouveaux arrivants effectuées en Ontario l’ont été dans le Grand Toronto; g) combien y a-t-il eu de nouveaux arrivants au Canada dans chacune des cinq dernières années, (i) dans chaque province ou territoire, (ii) combien se sont établis dans chaque province ou territoire, (iii) combien se sont établis dans chacune des dix plus grandes villes canadiennes; h) de quelles données le gouvernement dispose-t-il sur le mouvement des nouveaux arrivants entre les provinces ou les villes dans les t ...

8. Considers that these principles could be complemented by additional attributes such as maintenance, availability, quality, neutrality and accountability; believes that all those principles need to be further detailed and defined, and that a specific monitoring system must be introduced to ensure their implementation at national and European level in the development of standards in support of EU policies and legislation;
8. considère que ces principes peuvent être complétés par d'autres caractéristiques, telles que l'entretien, la disponibilité, la qualité, la neutralité et la responsabilité; pense qu'il convient de détailler davantage et de mieux définir tous ces principes, et qu'il est nécessaire de mettre en place un système de surveillance spécifique pour garantir leur mise en œuvre, aux niveaux national et européen, dans le cadre de l'élaboration de normes à l'appui des politiques et des législations de l'Union européenne;

Q-183 Mr. Casson (Lethbridge) With respect to the transfer payments as outlined in the 1998-99 Estimates (Part III), could the Minister of Environment provide details as to the recipients, use of, or any further details concerning the monies distributed to date under Grants and Contributions, specifically: (a) the contribution to the Province of British Columbia and environmental non-government organizations (ENGO's) - Wildlife Strategy, Pacific Coast Joint Venture of $325,000; (b) the contribution to Building International Partnership of $1,009,423; and (c) the contributions made under Minister's Authority of $393,500?
Q-183 M. Casson (Lethbridge) En ce qui concerne les paiements de transfert indiqués dans le Budget des dépenses pour 1998-1999 (partie III), le ministre de l'Environnement pourrait-il fournir des détails sur les bénéficiaires, l'usage ou tout autre détail concernant les fonds versés jusqu'ici au poste des subventions et contributions, et en particulier : a) la contribution de 325 000 dollars à la Colombie-Britannique et aux organismes non gouvernementaux à vocation écologique, Wildlife Strategy et Pacific Coast Joint Venture; b) la contribution de 1 009 423 dollars à Building International Partnership; c) les contributions s'élevant à 393 500 dollars en vertu d'une autorisation du ministre?

Recalls its conclusion of 29 April 1993, according to which detailed criteria and mechanisms should be established for cost-effective implementation and improved management of the Framework Programme in order to ensure that its objectives are fully met; reaffirms also its emphasis on the need for the improvement of procedures for systematic, independent and timely evaluation of the Framework Programme; 2. Welcomes in this respect the initiatives undertaken by the Commission with a view to improving the management of the EC research programmes and encourages the Commission to develop further such initiatives in time for the implementation of the Fourth Framework Programme; 3. Emphasizes that procedures and tools for programme implementation should as far as possible be simplified and harmonized in order to facilitate participation in Community research programmes, particularly by SMEs, and to allow for smooth, transparent and timely implementation of the Framework Programme; welcomes in this respect the circulation by the Commission of information bulletins on a regular basis; 4. Would welcome in particular, without prejudice to the quality and transparency of the selection procedure, improvements in specific areas, such as the shortening of delays between deadlines for receipt of proposals and start of selected projects and the provision of information to applicants on non-selected proposals; 5. Takes note of the Commission's intention to assess in further detail the possible benefits and disadvantages of decentralized management and possible further concrete measures that could be taken in this field, so as to enable Council to take a view on this issue as soon as possible; 6. Considers that possible new types of activities, for example thematic networks of excellence, concertation networks and consortia for integrated projects, as proposed by the Commission, need to be clarified further; 7. Reaffirms the importance of the role of programme committees in th ...
Recalls its conclusion of 29 April 1993, according to which detailed criteria and mechanisms should be established for cost-effective implementation and improved management of the Framework Programme in order to ensure that its objectives are fully met; reaffirms also its emphasis on the need for the improvement of procedures for systematic, independent and timely evaluation of the Framework Programme; 2. Welcomes in this respect the initiatives undertaken by the Commission with a view to improving the management of the EC research programmes and encourages the Commission to develop further such initiatives in time for the implementation of the 4th Framework Programme; 3. Emphasizes that procedures and tools for programme implementation should as far as possible be simplified and harmonised in order to facilitate participation in Community research programmes, particularly by SMEs, and to allow for smooth, transparent and timely implementation of the Framework Programme; welcomes in this respect the circulation by the Commission of information bulletins on a regular basis; 4. Would welcome in particular, without prejudice to the quality and transparency of the selection procedure, improvements in specific areas, such as the shortening of delays between deadlines for receipt of proposals and start of selected projects and the provision of information to applicants on non-selected proposals; 5. Takes note of the Commission's intention to assess in further detail the possible benefits and disadvantages of decentralised management and possible further concrete measures that could be taken in this field, so as to enable Council to take a view on this issue as soon as possible; 6. Considers that possible new types of activities, for example thematic networks of excellence, concertation networks and consortia for integrated projects, as proposed by the Commission, need to be clarified further; 7. Reaffirms the importance of the role of programme committees in the m ...