Vertaling van "alfredo pallone had made " (Engels → Frans) :

Alfredo Pallone had made it known that he had not been able to take part in the following votes: report by Carl Haglund - A7-0182/2011 , report by Andreas Schwab - A7-0038/2011 , report by Salvatore Tatarella - A7-0091/2011 , report by Romana Jordan Cizelj - A7-0214/2011 , report by Francesca Balzani - A7-0230/2011 and report by Albert Deß - A7-0202/2011 .
Alfredo Pallone a fait savoir qu'il n'a pas pu participer aux votes suivants: Rapport Carl Haglund - A7-0182/2011 , Rapport Andreas Schwab - A7-0038/2011 , Rapport Salvatore Tatarella - A7-0091/2011 , Rapport Romana Jordan Cizelj - A7-0214/2011 , Rapport Francesca Balzani - A7-0230/2011 et Rapport Albert Deß - A7-0202/2011 .

Alfredo Pallone had made it known that he had not been able to take part in the following votes: report by Carl Haglund - A7-0182/2011, report by Andreas Schwab - A7-0038/2011, report by Salvatore Tatarella - A7-0091/2011, report by Romana Jordan Cizelj - A7-0214/2011, report by Francesca Balzani - A7-0230/2011 and report by Albert Deß - A7-0202/2011.
Alfredo Pallone a fait savoir qu'il n'a pas pu participer aux votes suivants: Rapport Carl Haglund - A7-0182/2011, Rapport Andreas Schwab - A7-0038/2011, Rapport Salvatore Tatarella - A7-0091/2011, Rapport Romana Jordan Cizelj - A7-0214/2011, Rapport Francesca Balzani - A7-0230/2011 et Rapport Albert Deß - A7-0202/2011.

Mr Albertini is accused of aggravated defamation since – in the words of the Public Prosecutor’s Office of Brescia (statement on the conclusion of the investigations of 26 June 2014) – “he made claims in respect of Mr Alfredo Robledo – the deputy prosecutor at the Milan Public Prosecutor’s Office – concerning a series of events, inferring that he had repeatedly committed offences in the course of the investigations that had been entrusted to him including, inter alia, abuse of office, failure to act, use of violence and perverting the course of justice”.
M. Albertini est accusé de diffamation aggravée car – selon les termes du ministère public de Brescia (déclaration sur la conclusion de l'enquête du 26 juin 2014) – "il mentionnait l'existence, à l'égard de M. Alfredo ROBLEDO – substitut du procureur de la République auprès du Tribunal de Milan –, de toute une série d'éléments permettant de conclure que le magistrat avait commis des délits de façon répétée tout au long de l'enquête qui lui avait été confiée, y compris abus de fonctions, omissions, violences privées, infractions contre l'action de la justice ou entraves à son fonctionnement, et autres".