Traduction de «for deciding which jurisdiction should » (Néerlandais → Français) :

Slechts één lidstaat heeft in zijn uitvoeringsmaatregel uitdrukkelijk verwezen naar de rol van de "Guidelines for deciding which jurisdiction should prosecute" (richtsnoeren voor het bepalen van de jurisdictie die strafvervolging zal instellen) van Eurojust van 2003.
Un seul État membre a explicitement reconnu, dans sa mesure de transposition, le rôle des lignes directrices «Comment décider à quelle juridiction confier les poursuites?» publiées par Eurojust en 2003.

Are there are any circumstances in which you think the peoples of Europe should have a referendum so that they can decide these issues?
Ne pensez-vous pas que les citoyens d’Europe devraient avoir le droit de se prononcer sur ces questions par voie de référendum?

It is not possible to carry out money laundering on checks on people who might not yet have been identified (or even born!) (ii) Identity checks should also be risk-based, with stricter checks being justified in cases of higher risk (iii) The extent to which corporate entities need verification beyond that which is publicly available from public records should be restricted to companies registered in or with material links to higher risk jurisdictions which do not meet acceptable standards.
It is not possible to carry out money laundering on checks on people who might not yet have been identified (or even born!) (ii) Identity checks should also be risk-based, with stricter checks being justified in cases of higher risk (iii) The extent to which corporate entities need verification beyond that which is publicly available from public records should be restricted to companies registered in or with material links to higher risk jurisdictions which do not meet acceptable standards.