Traduction de «therapies a meta-analysis of randomised » (Néerlandais → Français) :

The antihypertensive and lipid lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT).JAMA 2002; 288: 2981-2997 (5) PAHOR M, PSATY B, ALERMAN M et al. Health outcomes associated with antagonists compared with other firstline antihypertensive therapies : a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
The antihypertensive and lipid lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2002 ; 288 : 2981-2997 (5) PAHOR M, PSATY B, ALERMAN M et al. Health outcomes associated with antagonists compared with other firstlineantihypertensive therapies : a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

JAMA 2002 ; 288 :2981-2997 (6) PAHOR M, PSATY B, ALERMAN M et al. Health outcomes associated with antagonists compared with other first-line antihypertensive therapies : a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
JAMA 2002 ; 288 : 2981-2997 (6) PAHOR M, PSATY B, ALERMAN M et al. Health outcomes associated with antagonists compared with other first-line antihypertensive therapies : a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Boussageon R, Bejan-Angoulvant T, Saadatian M et al. Effect of intensive glucose lowering treatment on all cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and microvascular events in type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
DOI : 10.1002/ 14651858.CD008143.pub2. Boussageon R, Bejan-Angoulvant T, Saadatian M et al. Effect of intensive glucose lowering treatment on all cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and microvascular events in type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000254.pub3. Vivekananthan DP, Penn MS, Sapp SK et al. Use of antioxidant vitamins for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of randomised trials.
Vivekananthan DP, Penn MS, Sapp SK et al. Use of antioxidant vitamins for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of randomised trials.

active forms of vitamin D: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
forms of vitamin D: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Bespreking van: – Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Dawson-Hughes B, Stahelin HB et al. Fall prevention with supplemental and active forms of vitamin D: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2009; 339:b3692.
Analyse de: ‐ Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Dawson-Hughes B, Stahelin HB et al. Fall prevention with supplemental and active forms of

Winblad B, Jones RW, Wirth Y, Stöffler A, Möbius HJ. Memantine in moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
Winblad B, Jones RW, Wirth Y et al. Memantine in moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.

Chang A, Lasserson T, Kiljander T et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of gastro-oesophageal reflux interventions
10. Chang A, Lasserson T, Kiljander T et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of gastro-oesophageal reflux interventions

(Glasier 2010) Glasier AF, Cameron ST, Fine PM, et al. Ulipristal acetate versus levenorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomised noninferiortiy trial and meta-analysis.
(Gallo 2008/2011) Gallo MF, Nanda K, Grimes DA et al. 20 μg versus > 20 μg estrogen combined oral contraceptives for

scope and purpose: 10/12 stakeholders involvement: 8/16 rigour of development: 7/28 (methods available only on request) clarity and presentation: 8/16 applicability: 3/12 editorial independence: 2/8 question: adequate search: insufficient selection: unclear quality appraisal: fair data-extraction: not given characteristics of original studies: not given meta-analysis: no pooling Randomisation: good concealment of allocation: no Blinding of outcome assessors: unclear Baseline characteristics comparable: yes Follow-up: sufficient Intention-to-treat: yes Contamination: unclear
scope and purpose: 10/12 stakeholders involvement: 8/16 rigour of development: 7/28 (methods available only on request) clarity and presentation: 8/16 applicability: 3/12 editorial independence: 2/8 question: adequate search: insufficient selection: unclear quality appraisal: fair data-extraction: not given characteristics of original studies: not given meta-analysis: no pooling