Vertaling van "study id relative risk " (Nederlands → Frans) :

Table 8: Evidence form HTA review : Breast cancer screening among women aged 40 – 49 Relative risks (intention to treat) with confidence reported for each study together with the results of a stepwise meta-analysis and cumulative CI Study ID Relative risk Confidence interval Cumulative RR Cumutlative CI UK Age Trial (UK) 0,83 (0,66-1,04) 0,83 (0,66-1,04) NBSS-1 (Canada) 0,97 (0,74-1,27) 0,89 (0,75-1,06) Malmö (Sweden) (0,58-1,77) 0,9 (0,76-1,06) Stockholm (Sweden) 1,08 (0,54-2,17) 0,91 (0,77-1,07) Göteborg (Sweden) 0,65 (0,40-1,05) 0,87 (0,75-1,02) HIP (USA) 0,75 (0,50-1,11) 0,86 (0,74-0,99) TCS (Sweden) 0,93 (0,63-1,36) 0,86 (0,75-0,99) Edinburgh (UK) 0,75 (0.48-1,18) 0,85 (0,75-0,97)
Table 10: Evidence form HTA review : Breast cancer screening among women aged 40 – 49 Relative risks (intention to treat) with confidence reported for each study together with the results of a stepwise meta-analysis and cumulative CI Study ID Relative risk Confidence interval Cumulative RR Cumutlative CI UK Age Trial (UK) 0,83 (0,66-1,04) 0,83 (0,66-1,04) NBSS-1 (Canada) 0,97 (0,74-1,27) 0,89 (0,75-1,06) Malmö (Sweden) (0,58-1,77) 0,9 (0,76-1,06) Stockholm (Sweden) 1,08 (0,54-2,17) 0,91 (0,77-1,07) Göteborg (Sweden) 0,65 (0,40-1,05) 0,87 (0,75-1,02) HIP (USA) 0,75 (0,50-1,11) 0,86 (0,74-0,99) TCS (Sweden) 0,93 (0,63-1,36) 0,86 (0,75-0,99) Edinburgh (UK) 0,75 (0.48-1,18) 0,85 (0,75-0,97)

Spontaneous cessation rate: 2.5% OR counselling only: 1.73 Incremental OR NRT gum (relative to counselling only): 1.63 Incremental OR NRT patch (relative to counselling only): 1.79 Incremental OR NRT spray (relative to counselling only): 2.35 Incremental OR NRT inhaler (relative to counselling only): 2.14 Incremental OR bupropion (relative to counselling only): 2.30 % of smokers still under treatment after the first month: 50% (range 40-60% in sensitivity analysis) % of smokers still under treatment after the second month: 20% (range 15-25% in sensitivity analysis) Lifetime relapse probability after one year of abstinence: 35% (range 10-50% in sensitivity analysis) Effect of smoking cessation on mortality derived from the results of the American Cancer Society Prevention Study II. The mortality rate for former smokers was projected by calculating a weighted average of the incremental differentials between mortality rates of neversmokers and smokers, weighted according to the duration of abstinence.
Spontaneous cessation rate: 2.5% OR counselling only: 1.73 Incremental OR NRT gum (relative to counselling only): 1.63 Incremental OR NRT patch (relative to counselling only): 1.79 Incremental OR NRT spray (relative to counselling only): 2.35 Incremental OR NRT inhaler (relative to counselling only): 2.14 Incremental OR Buproprion (relative to counselling only): 2.30 % of smokers still under treatment after the first month: 50% (range 40-60% in sensitivity analysis) % of smokers still under treatment after the second month: 20% (range 15-25% in sensitivity analysis) Lifetime relapse probability after one year of abstinence: 35% (range 10-50% in sensitivity analysis) Effect of smoking cessation on mortality derived from the results of the American Cancer Society Prevention Study II. The mortality rate for former smokers was projected by calculating a weighted average of the incremental differentials between mortality rates of neversmokers and smokers, weighted according to the duration of abstinence.

Results from the Japanese KYOTO HEART study, presented in September at the European Society of Cardiology Congress, demonstrated that the addition of Diovan to a non-ARB-based treatment regimen for high blood pressure provided a significant 45% relative risk reduction in cardiovascular events, including stroke, over a conventional non-ARB treatment regimen.
Les résultats de l’étude japonaise KYOTO HEART, présentés au Congrès de la Société Européenne de Cardiologie, ont prouvé que l’adjonction de Diovan lors d’un traitement contre l’hypertension non basé sur les ARA a conduit à une réduction importante de 45% du risque relatif d’accidents cardiovasculaires, notamment cérébraux, par rapport à un traitement non ARA conventionnel.

The study confirmed a significant benefit for Femara versus tamoxifen in reducing the risk of distant metastases and the overall risk of breast cancer recurrence.
Cette étude a confirmé les avantages importants de Femara comparé au tamoxifène pour réduire le risque de métastases distantes et globalement celui de récidive du cancer du sein.

Office de la Naissance et de l'Enfance odds ratio over-the-counter papanicolou plasma protein A polymerase chain reaction Public Health Laboratory Service pregnancy-induced hypertension proton pump inhibitor positive predictive value premature rupture of membranes routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists randomised controlled trial eferences rhesus D recombinant immunoblot assay Rijksinstituut voor Ziekte- en Invaliditeitsverzekering ribonucleic acid random plasma glucose rapid plasmin reagin test relative risk reagent strip testing standard deviation single entry two step symphysis-fundal height small for gestational age Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network sexueel overdraagbare aandoening Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada symphysis pubis dysfunction Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay thyroïd stimulating hormone nconjugated oestriol United Kingdom United States Centers for Disease Control and
oral glucose tolerance test Office de la Naissance et de l'Enfance odds ratio over-the-counter papanicolou plasma protein A polymerase chain reaction Public Health Laboratory Service pregnancy-induced hypertension proton pump inhibitor positive predictive value premature rupture of membranes routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists randomised controlled trial eferences rhesus D recombinant immunoblot assay Rijksinstituut voor Ziekte- en Invaliditeitsverzekering ribonucleic acid random plasma glucose rapid plasmin reagin test relative risk reagent strip testing standard deviation single entry two step symphysis-fundal height small for gestational age Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network sexueel overdraagbare aandoening Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada symphysis pubis dysfunction Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay thyroïd stimulating hormone nconjugated oestriol United Kingdom United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention US Preventive Services Task Force ultrasound scan urinary tract infection Veneral Disease Research Laboratory (test for syphilis) vaginal examination Vlaamse Organisaties van Vroedvrouwen Vlaamse Vereniging voor Obstetrie en Gynaecologie Wereldgezondheidsorganisatie World Health Organization weighted mean difference Wetenschappelijke Vereniging van Vlaamse Huisartsen

ERR: excess relative risk/ toegevoegd relatief risico.
ERR: excess relative risk/ excès de risque relatif.

It is computed as the difference between the overall rate in the population and the rate in the more advantaged group, dividedd by the overall rate in the population. In this chapter, we highlighted the indicators for which we observed a relative risk (RR) as large as 1.2 (or 0.83 when the gradient was reverse).
It is computed as the difference between the overall rate in the population and the rate in the more advantaged group, divided by the overall rate in the population.

De resultaten uit de studies werden zonodig omgezet naar dezelfde eindmetingen, met name " absolute risk reduction" (ARR) en " number needed to treat" (NNT).
Les résultats ont été extraits des études et, le cas échéant, convertis dans les mêmes instruments de mesure, à savoir : réduction absolue du risque (ARR) et nombre de sujets à traiter (NNT).

Results from a Phase III study involving Afinitor in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET), a rare and aggressive form of cancer with limited treatment options, showed that Afinitor extended median progression-free survival from 4.6 to 11 months versus placebo and reduced the risk of cancer progression by 65%.
(TNE) du pancréas, une forme rare et agressive de cancer difficile à traiter, ont montré qu’Afinitor allongeait la survie moyenne sans progression de la maladie de 4,6 à 11 mois par rapport à un placebo et réduisait de 65% le risque de progression du cancer.

Acknowledgements: Voor haar waardevolle bijdrage in het gedeelte over meta-analyse: Cécile Dubois (KCE) Voor hun bijdrage bij het scoren van de indicatoren: Raf Brouns en Matthieu Rutgers (Belgian Stroke Council) Voor het valideren van de informatie over hun land: Zweden: Kiell Asplund (Chair, Risks Stroke Umeal), Bo Norrving (Professor, Lund University-Steering committee member Riks stroke) Nederland: Martien Limburg (Neuroloog, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, Stichting Kennisnetwerk); Schotland: Martin Dennis (Division of Clinical Neurosciences – Western General Hospital University of Edinburgh), Peter Langhorne (Professor of Stroke Care, Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences Division – University of Glasgow) Verenigd Koninkrijk: Patrick Gompertz (Barts and the London Brain Attack Center, London), Gill Gluckie (Clinical lead, stroke, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ hospital, clinical lead, S/East London stroke network) Frankrijk: France Woimant (Service de neurologie, hôpital Lariboisière, Paris – “Agence Régionale de Santé – Ile-de-France”), Didier Leys (Département de neurologie, Hôpital universitaire de Lille) Duitsland: Peter Heuschmann (Neurologische klinik und poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg) German Stroke Register Study Group), E. Bernd Ringelstein (Neurologische klinik und poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Münster)
Remerciements : Pour son aide précieuse relative à la méta-analyse : Cécile Dubois (KCE) Pour leur contribution au scoring des indicateurs : Raf Brouns et Matthieu Rutgers (Belgian Stroke Council) Pour la validation de la description de leur pays : Suède : Kiell Asplund (Chair, Risks Stroke Umea), Bo Norrving (Professor, Lund University-Steering committee member Riks stroke) Pays-Bas : Martien Limburg (Neuroloog, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, Stichting Kennisnetwerk) Ecosse : Martin Dennis (Division of Clinical Neurosciences – Western General Hospital University of Edinburgh), Peter Langhorne (Professor of Stroke Care, Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences Division – University of Glasgow) Grande-Bretagne : Patrick Gompertz (Barts and the London Brain Attack Center, London), Gill Gluckie (Clinical lead, stroke, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ hospital, clinical lead, S/East London stroke network) France : France Woimant (Service de neurologie, hôpital Lariboisière, Paris – “Agence Régionale de Santé – Ilede-France”), Didier Leys (Département de neurologie, Hôpital universitaire de Lille) Allemagne : Peter Heuschmann (Neurologische klinik und poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg) German Stroke Register Study Group), E. Bernd Ringelstein (Neurologische klinik und poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Münster)