Traduction de «ratio of nrt versus control » (Néerlandais → Français) :

Odds ratio of NRT versus control: 1.67 Odds ratio of bupropion versus control: 2.1 Odds ratio of NRT+bupropion versus control: 2.65 From these Odds Ratios and information on the control 12-month quit rate in the comparator intervention (0.04 for brief advice and 0.10 for counselling), the 12-month quit rate of treatment is calculated: treated quit rate for brief advice+NRT: 0.0650 treated quit rate for brief advice+bupropion: 0.0805 treated quit rate for brief advice+bupropion+NRT: 0.0994 treated quit rate for counselling+NRT: 0.1565 treated quit rate for counselling+bupropion: 0.1892 treated quit rate for counselling+bupropion+NRT: 0.2275 spontaneous cessation rate: 0.01. lifetime relapse rate: 40% (range 30-50%). number of LYG per quitter: 2 (range 1-3). number of QALYs gained per quitter: 2.7 (range 1.35-4.05) not reported The table gives an overview of the assumptions with respect to costs and effects (quit rates) in the average scenario.
Odds ratio of NRT versus control: 1.67 Odds ratio of Buproprion versus control: 2.1 Odds ratio of NRT+Buproprion versus control: 2.65 From these Odds Ratios and information on the control 12-month quit rate in the comparator intervention (0.04 for brief advice and 0.10 for counselling), the 12-month quit rate of treatment is calculated: treated quit rate for brief advice+NRT: 0.0650 treated quit rate for brief advice+Buproprion: 0.0805 treated quit rate for brief advice+Buproprion+NRT: 0.0994 treated quit rate for counselling+NRT: 0.1565 treated quit rate for counselling+Buproprion: 0.1892 treated quit rate for counselling+Buproprion+NRT: 0.2275 spontaneous cessation rate: 0.01. lifetime relapse rate: 40% (range 30-50%). number of LYG per quitter: 2 (range 1-3). number of QALYs gained per quitter: 2.7 (range 1.35-4.05) not reported The table gives an overview of the assumptions with respect to costs and effects (quit rates) in the average scenario.

- RADIANT 2, a placebo-controlled Phase III study of Afinitor in combination with Sandostatin LAR versus Sandostatin LAR alone in patients with advanced carcinoid tumors missed the primary endpoint by a very small statistical margin (progression-free survival Hazard Ratio = 0.77 in favor of Afinitor, p = 0.026 versus p=0.024 predefined).
- RADIANT 2, une étude de phase III contrôlée par placebo d’Afinitor en association avec Sandostatine LAR comparé à Sandostatine LAR seul dans les tumeurs carcinoïdes avancées a raté son critère principal avec une marge statistique très petite ( survie sans progression de la maladie « hazard ratio » = 0,77 en faveur d’Afinitor, p = 0,026 contre p = 0,024 prédéfinie) On a observé un déséquilibre de base entre les deux groupes de traitements qui sera étudié.

RADIANT 2, a placebo-controlled Phase III study of Afinitor in combination with Sandostatin LAR versus Sandostatin LAR alone in patients with advanced carcinoid tumors missed the primary endpoint by a very small statistical margin (progression-free survival Hazard Ratio = 0.77 in favor of Afinitor, p = 0.026 vs p=0.024 predefined).
RADIANT 2, une étude de phase III contrôlée par placebo d’Afinitor en association avec Sandostatine LAR comparé à Sandostatine LAR seul dans les tumeurs carcinoïdes avancées a raté son critère principal avec une marge statistique très petite ( survie sans progression de la maladie « hazard ratio » = 0,77 en faveur d’Afinitor, p = 0,026 contre p = 0,024 prédéfinie)..