Vertaling van "range 0-5 in sensitivity " (Nederlands → Frans) :

Spontaneous cessation rate: 2.5% OR counselling only: 1.73 Incremental OR NRT gum (relative to counselling only): 1.63 Incremental OR NRT patch (relative to counselling only): 1.79 Incremental OR NRT spray (relative to counselling only): 2.35 Incremental OR NRT inhaler (relative to counselling only): 2.14 Incremental OR bupropion (relative to counselling only): 2.30 % of smokers still under treatment after the first month: 50% (range 40-60% in sensitivity analysis) % of smokers still under treatment after the second month: 20% (range 15-25% in sensitivity analysis) Lifetime relapse probability after one year of abstinence: 35% (range 10-50% in sensitivity analysis) Effect of smoking cessation on mortality derived from the results of the American Cancer Society Prevention Study II. The mortality rate for former smokers was projected by calculating a weighted average of the incremental differentials between mortality rates of neversmokers and smokers, weighted according to the duration of abstinence.
Spontaneous cessation rate: 2.5% OR counselling only: 1.73 Incremental OR NRT gum (relative to counselling only): 1.63 Incremental OR NRT patch (relative to counselling only): 1.79 Incremental OR NRT spray (relative to counselling only): 2.35 Incremental OR NRT inhaler (relative to counselling only): 2.14 Incremental OR Buproprion (relative to counselling only): 2.30 % of smokers still under treatment after the first month: 50% (range 40-60% in sensitivity analysis) % of smokers still under treatment after the second month: 20% (range 15-25% in sensitivity analysis) Lifetime relapse probability after one year of abstinence: 35% (range 10-50% in sensitivity analysis) Effect of smoking cessation on mortality derived from the results of the American Cancer Society Prevention Study II. The mortality rate for former smokers was projected by calculating a weighted average of the incremental differentials between mortality rates of neversmokers and smokers, weighted according to the duration of abstinence.

Treatment (both NRT and bupropion) lasts at least 1 month Retail price of NRT gum: not reported Retail price of NRT patch (3-month course): €354.54 (€, 2001) Retail price of NRT nasal spray (3-months course): €743.02 3% (range 0-5% in sensitivity analysis)
Treatment (both NRT and Buproprion) lasts at least 1 month Retail price of NRT gum: not reported Retail price of NRT patch (3-month course): €354.54 (€, 2001) Retail price of NRT nasal spray (3-months course): €743.02 3% (range 0-5% in sensitivity analysis)

2001 € Costs include additional time spent by GP offering, prescribing and following-up pharmacological treatment and retail prices of NRT or bupropion GP counselling occurs opportunistically during consultations for other diseases Counselling takes 10 minutes (range 5-15 minutes in sensitivity analysis).
2001 € Costs include additional time spent by GP offering, prescribing and following-up pharmacological treatment and retail prices of NRT or Buproprion GP counselling occurs opportunistically during consultations for other diseases Counselling takes 10 minutes (range 5-15 minutes in sensitivity analysis).

Med IQR Med IQR Med IQR Med IQR (Range) (Range) (Range) (Range)
Méd IQR Méd IQR Méd IQR Méd IQR (Range) (Range) (Range) (Range)

Odds ratio of NRT versus control: 1.67 Odds ratio of bupropion versus control: 2.1 Odds ratio of NRT+bupropion versus control: 2.65 From these Odds Ratios and information on the control 12-month quit rate in the comparator intervention (0.04 for brief advice and 0.10 for counselling), the 12-month quit rate of treatment is calculated: treated quit rate for brief advice+NRT: 0.0650 treated quit rate for brief advice+bupropion: 0.0805 treated quit rate for brief advice+bupropion+NRT: 0.0994 treated quit rate for counselling+NRT: 0.1565 treated quit rate for counselling+bupropion: 0.1892 treated quit rate for counselling+bupropion+NRT: 0.2275 spontaneous cessation rate: 0.01. lifetime relapse rate: 40% (range 30-50%). number of LYG per quitter: 2 (range 1-3). number of QALYs gained per quitter: 2.7 (range 1.35-4.05) not reported The table gives an overview of the assumptions with respect to costs and effects (quit rates) in the average scenario.
Odds ratio of NRT versus control: 1.67 Odds ratio of Buproprion versus control: 2.1 Odds ratio of NRT+Buproprion versus control: 2.65 From these Odds Ratios and information on the control 12-month quit rate in the comparator intervention (0.04 for brief advice and 0.10 for counselling), the 12-month quit rate of treatment is calculated: treated quit rate for brief advice+NRT: 0.0650 treated quit rate for brief advice+Buproprion: 0.0805 treated quit rate for brief advice+Buproprion+NRT: 0.0994 treated quit rate for counselling+NRT: 0.1565 treated quit rate for counselling+Buproprion: 0.1892 treated quit rate for counselling+Buproprion+NRT: 0.2275 spontaneous cessation rate: 0.01. lifetime relapse rate: 40% (range 30-50%). number of LYG per quitter: 2 (range 1-3). number of QALYs gained per quitter: 2.7 (range 1.35-4.05) not reported The table gives an overview of the assumptions with respect to costs and effects (quit rates) in the average scenario.

27. Wadsworth JD, Joiner S, Hill AF, Campbell TA, Desbruslais M, Luthert PJ, et al. Tissue distribution of protease resistant prion protein in variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease using a highly sensitive immunoblotting assay.
27. Wadsworth JD, Joiner S, Hill AF, Campbell TA, Desbruslais M, Luthert PJ, et al. Tissue distribution of protease resistant prion protein in variant Creutzfeldt- Jakob disease using a highly sensitive immunoblotting assay.

Kim C et al - Am.Heart J. 44 2001 meta analysis yes 82 studies Coronary disease diagnostic : maximum sensitivity with vasodilatator combined with SPECT, maximum specificity with vasodilatator combined with DSE.
Kim C et al - Am.Heart J. 46 2001 meta analysis yes 82 studies Coronary disease diagnostic : maximum sensitivity with vasodilatator combined with SPECT, maximum specificity with vasodilatator combined with DSE.

“ Est reconnu incapable de travailler au sens de la présente loi coordonnée, le travailleur qui a cessé toute activité en conséquence directe du début ou de l’aggravation de lésions ou de troubles fonctionnels dont il est reconnu qu’ils entraînent une réduction de sa capacité de gain, à un taux égal ou inférieur au tiers de ce qu’une personne de même condition et de même formation peut gagner par son travail, dans le groupe de professions dans lesquelles se range l’activité professionnelle exercée par l’intéressé au moment où il est devenu incapable de travailler ou dans les diverses professions qu’il a ou qu’il aurait pu exercer du fait de sa formation professionnelle”.
“Est reconnu incapable de travailler au sens de la présente loi coordonnée, le travailleur qui a cessé toute activité en conséquence directe du début ou de l'aggravation de lésions ou de troubles fonctionnels dont il est reconnu qu'ils entraînent une réduction de sa capacité de gain, à un taux égal ou inférieur au tiers de ce qu'une personne de même condition et de même formation peut gagner par son travail, dans le groupe de professions dans lesquelles se range l'activité professionnelle exercée par l'intéressé au moment où il est devenu incapable de travailler ou dans les diverses professions qu'il a ou qu'il aurait pu exercer du fait de sa formation professionnelle”.

Die code bepaalt de rang van een specialiteit in de classificatie van de Wereldgezondheidsorganisatie; deze classificatie is gebaseerd op de anatomische, therapeutische en chemische uitwerking die een specialiteit op het menselijk lichaam heeft.
Ce code détermine la place d’une spécialité au sein de la classification élaborée par l’Organisation mondiale de la santé, qui se fonde sur les effets anatomiques, thérapeutiques et chimiques d’une spécialité sur le corps humain.

Table 15: False positive and false negative mammography results (KCE table) Review Study Type of study Findings Range Mushlin et al, 1998 meta‐ analysis probability of false positive screening per screening 0,9 % to 6,5 % Olivotto et al, 1998 Hofvind et al, 2004 Elmore et al, 1998 Elmore et al, 1998 observational
Table 17: False positive and false negative mammography results (KCE table) Review Study Type of study Findings Range Mushlin et al, 1998 meta‐ analysis probability of false positive screening per screening 0,9 % to 6,5 % Olivotto et al, 1998 Hofvind et al, 2004 Elmore et al, 1998 Elmore et al, 1998 observational