Vertaling van "randomized double-blind study " (Nederlands → Frans) :

controlled trial without randomization double blind double blind randomised placebo controlled trial economic evaluation evaluation guidelines
case series cross-sectional study controlled trial without randomization double blind double blind randomised placebo controlled trial economic evaluation evaluation guidelines

M. Antibiotic prophylaxis for infectious complications after therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography : a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Byl B., Deviere J., Struelens M.J., Roucloux I. , De Coninck A., Thys J.P., and Cremer M. Antibiotic prophylaxis for infectious complications after therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

41. Tonnesen P, Tonstad S, Hjalmarson A, Lebargy F, Van Spiegel PI, Hider A et al. A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 1-year study of bupropion SR for smoking cessation.
41. Tonnesen P, Tonstad S, Hjalmarson A, Lebargy F, Van Spiegel PI, Hider A et al. A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 1-year study of Bupropion SR for smoking cessation.

1)Bron Management of Phantom Pain with a Textile, Electromagnetically-Acting Stump Liner: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study.
Source: Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study.

Bron Management of Phantom Pain with a Textile, Electromagnetically-Acting Stump Liner: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study Uwe Kern, MD; Bernd Altkemper and Matthias Kohl, Center of Pain Management and Palliative Care (U.K.), Wiesbaden; Medi Ltd (B.A.), Bayreuth; and Statistics & Mathematics Service (StaMatS) (M.K.), Bayreuth, Germany Journal of Pain and Symptom Management Vol. 32 No. 4 oktober 2006.
Source Management of Phantom Pain with a Textile, Electromagnetically-Acting Stump Liner: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study Uwe Kern, MD; Bernd Altkemper and Matthias Kohl, Center of Pain Management and Palliative Care (U.K.), Wiesbaden; Medi Ltd (B.A.), Bayreuth; and Statistics & Mathematics Service (StaMatS) (M.K.), Bayreuth, Germany Journal of Pain and Symptom Management Vol. 32 No. 4 October 2006.

Co-transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells and HLA-mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic cells after nonmyeloablative conditioning: a phase II randomized double-blind study.
Conditionally PLAG1-induced mouse tumors : comprehensive evaluation of various tumor types and appreciation of preclinical-trial-selected small molecule IGF-R inhibitors in therapy

Diener HC, Bogousslavsky J, Brass LM et al. Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Sacco RL, Diener HC, Yusuf S et al. Aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel for recurrent stroke. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:1238-51.

Lederle F, Busch D, Mattox K et al. Cost-effective treatment in the elderly. A randomized double-blind comparison of sorbitol and lactulose.
A randomized double-blind comparison of sorbitol and lactulose.

Table 2: Search for additional RCTs Search Benefit and harms of mammography screening (40-49 y) questions Note Specific search for RCT’s Date 27/04/2010 Keywords Breast neoplasms (MESH), mass screening (or early detection) (MESH), mammography (MESH) Medline 1 Randomized controlled trials/ (66083) Medline (OVID): (OVID): 2 Randomized controlled trial.pt (289038) Filter Filter 3 Random allocation/ (67885) RCT RCT 4 Double blind method/ (105956) 5 Single blind method/ (13834) 6 Clinical trial.pt (460563) 7 exp clinical trial/ (606505) 8 or/1-7 (718664) 9 (clinic$ adj trial$).tw (146686) 10 ((singl$ or doubl$ or treb$ or tripl$) adj (blind$3 or mask$3)).tw (105209) 11 Placebos/ (28712) 12 Placebo$.tw (125428) 13 Randomly allocated.tw (12231) 14 (allocated adj2 random).tw (654) 15 9 or 10 or 11 or 12 or 13 or 14 (312732) 16 8 or 15 (842155) 17 Case report.tw (155883) 18 Letter.pt (688664) 19 Historical article.pt (263287) 20 Review of reported cases.pt (0) 21 Review,multicase.pt (0) 22 17 or 18 or 19 or 20 or 21 (1098644) 23 16 not 22 (822810) 24 Breast/ or Breast Diseases/ (30717) 25 Neoplasms/ (216644) 26 24 and 25 (535) 27 (breast$ adj5 neoplasm$).tw (1588) 28 (breast$ adj5 cancer$).tw (135654) 29 (breast$ adj5 carcin$).tw (31778) 30 (breast$ adj5 tumo$).tw (23438) 31 (breast$ adj5 metasta$).tw (16580) 32 (breast$ adj5 malig$).tw (7361) 33 exp Breast Neoplasms/ (171606) 34 exp Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/ (8460) 35 26 or 27 or 28 or 29 or 30 or 31 or 32 or 33 or 34 (207174) 36 mammography.mp (23598) 37 screening.mp (274211) 38 36 or 37 (288429) 39 23 and 35 and 38 (2326) 40 limit 39 to (yr=" 2008 -Current" and " all adult (19 plus years)" and (dutch or english or french)) (241) 41 from 40 keep 1-241 (241) 42 from 41 keep 1-241 (241) CENTRAL Breast neoplasms (MESH) and early detection (MESH) or 61 mammography (MESH) (manual limit 2008-2010) in title , abstracts or key words
Table 4: Search for additional RCTs Search Benefit and harms of mammography screening (40-49 y) questions Note Specific search for RCT’s Date 27/04/2010 Keywords Breast neoplasms (MESH), mass screening (or early detection) (MESH), mammography (MESH) Medline 1 Randomized controlled trials/ (66083) Medline (OVID): (OVID): 2 Randomized controlled trial.pt (289038) Filter Filter 3 Random allocation/ (67885) RCT RCT 4 Double blind method/ (105956) 5 Single blind method/ (13834) 6 Clinical trial.pt (460563) 7 exp clinical trial/ (606505) 8 or/1-7 (718664) 9 (clinic$ adj trial$).tw (146686) 10 ((singl$ or doubl$ or treb$ or tripl$) adj (blind$3 or mask$3)).tw (105209) 11 Placebos/ (28712) 12 Placebo$.tw (125428) 13 Randomly allocated.tw (12231) 14 (allocated adj2 random).tw (654) 15 9 or 10 or 11 or 12 or 13 or 14 (312732) 16 8 or 15 (842155) 17 Case report.tw (155883) 18 Letter.pt (688664) 19 Historical article.pt (263287) 20 Review of reported cases.pt (0) 21 Review,multicase.pt (0) 22 17 or 18 or 19 or 20 or 21 (1098644) 23 16 not 22 (822810) 24 Breast/ or Breast Diseases/ (30717) 25 Neoplasms/ (216644) 26 24 and 25 (535) 27 (breast$ adj5 neoplasm$).tw (1588) 28 (breast$ adj5 cancer$).tw (135654) 29 (breast$ adj5 carcin$).tw (31778) 30 (breast$ adj5 tumo$).tw (23438) 31 (breast$ adj5 metasta$).tw (16580) 32 (breast$ adj5 malig$).tw (7361) 33 exp Breast Neoplasms/ (171606) 34 exp Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/ (8460) 35 26 or 27 or 28 or 29 or 30 or 31 or 32 or 33 or 34 (207174) 36 mammography.mp (23598) 37 screening.mp (274211) 38 36 or 37 (288429) 39 23 and 35 and 38 (2326) 40 limit 39 to (yr=" 2008 -Current" and " all adult (19 plus years)" and (dutch or english or french)) (241) 41 from 40 keep 1-241 (241) 42 from 41 keep 1-241 (241) CENTRAL Breast neoplasms (MESH) and early detection (MESH) or 61 mammography (MESH) (manual limit 2008-2010) in title , abstracts or key words

Deze publicatie is het onderwerp geweest van talrijk commentaar (3) , zoals het benadrukken dat de meta-analyse, studies inhield waarbij een niet adequate of onduidelijke methode van " double blind test" gevolgd werd en dat men niet verklaart waarom een gekende klinische proef, over een grote groep patiënten, ontbreekt.
Cette publication a fait l’objet de nombreux commentaires (3) , notamment l’inclusion dans la métaanalyse d’études dont la méthode de " mise en double insu" est inadéquate ou peu claire, ainsi que l’absence inexpliquée d’un essai clinique connu portant sur de nombreux patients.