Vertaling van "not reported " (Nederlands → Frans) :

The issue of the rather high supplementary intake of group B vitamins - which raises questions at a nutritional level (AFSSA, 2006 and previous advisory reports of the Belgian Superior Health Council: see below) - is not discussed in this advisory report because, in spite of their unnecessarily high addition, they do not appear to cause any concern with respect to food safety.
La problématique des apports complémentaires assez élevés en vitamines du groupe B qui pose question au plan nutritionnel (AFSSA, 2006 et précédents avis du conseil Supérieur de la Santé de Belgique: voir ci-après) n’est pas considérée dans le présent avis, notamment parce qu’elle ne semble pas soulever d’objections au plan de la sécurité alimentaire même si ces apports sont inutilement trop élevés.

DE- Product Safety report highlights accident risks not reported through RAPEX 06-09-2012
DE- Product Safety report highlights accident risks not reported through RAPEX 06/09/2012

Table 3: Update of evidence found in SR and HTA Search Radiation harms of mammography screening (40-49 y) questions Note Update of HTA (ETMIS) Date 03/05/2010 Keywords Breast neoplasms, mammography/ adverse effects, mass screening/ adverse effects Medline Case report.tw (156081) (OVID): 2 Letter.pt (689184) Filter 3 Historical article.pt (263481) RCT 4 Review of reported cases.pt (0) 5 Review,multicase.pt (0) 6 or/1-5 (1099551) 7 Breast/ or Breast Diseases/ (30731) 8 Neoplasms/ (216844) 9 7 and 8 (536) 10 exp Breast Neoplasms/ (171800) 11 (breast$ adj5 neoplas$).tw (2557) 12 (breast$ adj5 cancer$).tw (135752) 13 (breast$ adj5 carcin$).tw (31777) 14 (breast$ adj5 tumo$).tw (23441) 15 (breast$ adj5 metasta$).tw (16582) 16 (breast$ adj5 malig$).tw (7361) 17 exp Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/ (8472) 18 9 or 10 or 11 or 12 or 13 or 14 or 15 or 16 or 17 (207367) 19 Mammography/ae [Adverse Effects] (517) 20 Mass Screening/ae [Adverse Effects] (325) 21 19 or 20 (763) 22 18 and 21 (443) 23 22 not 6 (379) 24 limit 23 to (yr=" 2005 -Current" and " all adult (19 plus years)" and (dutch or english or french)) (44) 25 from 24 keep 1-44 (44)
Table 5: Update of evidence found in SR and HTA Search Radiation harms of mammography screening (40-49 y) questions Note Update of HTA (ETMIS) Date 03/05/2010 Keywords Breast neoplasms, mammography/ adverse effects, mass screening/ adverse effects Medline Case report.tw (156081) (OVID): 2 Letter.pt (689184) Filter 3 Historical article.pt (263481) RCT 4 Review of reported cases.pt (0) 5 Review,multicase.pt (0) 6 or/1-5 (1099551) 7 Breast/ or Breast Diseases/ (30731) 8 Neoplasms/ (216844) 9 7 and 8 (536) 10 exp Breast Neoplasms/ (171800) 11 (breast$ adj5 neoplas$).tw (2557) 12 (breast$ adj5 cancer$).tw (135752) 13 (breast$ adj5 carcin$).tw (31777) 14 (breast$ adj5 tumo$).tw (23441) 15 (breast$ adj5 metasta$).tw (16582) 16 (breast$ adj5 malig$).tw (7361) 17 exp Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/ (8472) 18 9 or 10 or 11 or 12 or 13 or 14 or 15 or 16 or 17 (207367) 19 Mammography/ae [Adverse Effects] (517) 20 Mass Screening/ae [Adverse Effects] (325) 21 19 or 20 (763) 22 18 and 21 (443) 23 22 not 6 (379) 24 limit 23 to (yr=" 2005 -Current" and " all adult (19 plus years)" and (dutch or english or french)) (44) 25 from 24 keep 1-44 (44)

Table 2: Search for additional RCTs Search Benefit and harms of mammography screening (40-49 y) questions Note Specific search for RCT’s Date 27/04/2010 Keywords Breast neoplasms (MESH), mass screening (or early detection) (MESH), mammography (MESH) Medline 1 Randomized controlled trials/ (66083) Medline (OVID): (OVID): 2 Randomized controlled trial.pt (289038) Filter Filter 3 Random allocation/ (67885) RCT RCT 4 Double blind method/ (105956) 5 Single blind method/ (13834) 6 Clinical trial.pt (460563) 7 exp clinical trial/ (606505) 8 or/1-7 (718664) 9 (clinic$ adj trial$).tw (146686) 10 ((singl$ or doubl$ or treb$ or tripl$) adj (blind$3 or mask$3)).tw (105209) 11 Placebos/ (28712) 12 Placebo$.tw (125428) 13 Randomly allocated.tw (12231) 14 (allocated adj2 random).tw (654) 15 9 or 10 or 11 or 12 or 13 or 14 (312732) 16 8 or 15 (842155) 17 Case report.tw (155883) 18 Letter.pt (688664) 19 Historical article.pt (263287) 20 Review of reported cases.pt (0) 21 Review,multicase.pt (0) 22 17 or 18 or 19 or 20 or 21 (1098644) 23 16 not 22 (822810) 24 Breast/ or Breast Diseases/ (30717) 25 Neoplasms/ (216644) 26 24 and 25 (535) 27 (breast$ adj5 neoplasm$).tw (1588) 28 (breast$ adj5 cancer$).tw (135654) 29 (breast$ adj5 carcin$).tw (31778) 30 (breast$ adj5 tumo$).tw (23438) 31 (breast$ adj5 metasta$).tw (16580) 32 (breast$ adj5 malig$).tw (7361) 33 exp Breast Neoplasms/ (171606) 34 exp Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/ (8460) 35 26 or 27 or 28 or 29 or 30 or 31 or 32 or 33 or 34 (207174) 36 mammography.mp (23598) 37 screening.mp (274211) 38 36 or 37 (288429) 39 23 and 35 and 38 (2326) 40 limit 39 to (yr=" 2008 -Current" and " all adult (19 plus years)" and (dutch or english or french)) (241) 41 from 40 keep 1-241 (241) 42 from 41 keep 1-241 (241) CENTRAL Breast neoplasms (MESH) and early detection (MESH) or 61 mammography (MESH) (manual limit 2008-2010) in title , abstracts or key words
Table 4: Search for additional RCTs Search Benefit and harms of mammography screening (40-49 y) questions Note Specific search for RCT’s Date 27/04/2010 Keywords Breast neoplasms (MESH), mass screening (or early detection) (MESH), mammography (MESH) Medline 1 Randomized controlled trials/ (66083) Medline (OVID): (OVID): 2 Randomized controlled trial.pt (289038) Filter Filter 3 Random allocation/ (67885) RCT RCT 4 Double blind method/ (105956) 5 Single blind method/ (13834) 6 Clinical trial.pt (460563) 7 exp clinical trial/ (606505) 8 or/1-7 (718664) 9 (clinic$ adj trial$).tw (146686) 10 ((singl$ or doubl$ or treb$ or tripl$) adj (blind$3 or mask$3)).tw (105209) 11 Placebos/ (28712) 12 Placebo$.tw (125428) 13 Randomly allocated.tw (12231) 14 (allocated adj2 random).tw (654) 15 9 or 10 or 11 or 12 or 13 or 14 (312732) 16 8 or 15 (842155) 17 Case report.tw (155883) 18 Letter.pt (688664) 19 Historical article.pt (263287) 20 Review of reported cases.pt (0) 21 Review,multicase.pt (0) 22 17 or 18 or 19 or 20 or 21 (1098644) 23 16 not 22 (822810) 24 Breast/ or Breast Diseases/ (30717) 25 Neoplasms/ (216644) 26 24 and 25 (535) 27 (breast$ adj5 neoplasm$).tw (1588) 28 (breast$ adj5 cancer$).tw (135654) 29 (breast$ adj5 carcin$).tw (31778) 30 (breast$ adj5 tumo$).tw (23438) 31 (breast$ adj5 metasta$).tw (16580) 32 (breast$ adj5 malig$).tw (7361) 33 exp Breast Neoplasms/ (171606) 34 exp Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/ (8460) 35 26 or 27 or 28 or 29 or 30 or 31 or 32 or 33 or 34 (207174) 36 mammography.mp (23598) 37 screening.mp (274211) 38 36 or 37 (288429) 39 23 and 35 and 38 (2326) 40 limit 39 to (yr=" 2008 -Current" and " all adult (19 plus years)" and (dutch or english or french)) (241) 41 from 40 keep 1-241 (241) 42 from 41 keep 1-241 (241) CENTRAL Breast neoplasms (MESH) and early detection (MESH) or 61 mammography (MESH) (manual limit 2008-2010) in title , abstracts or key words

114 These data are not presented in detail in this report. 8.2.2.2 Inequalities in the indicators of accessibility The percentage of households reporting to have delayed contacts with the health system for financial reasons was strongly related to the income level, with 27% of delay in the households of the lowest quintile versus 4%
8.2.2.2 Inequalities in the indicators of accessibility The percentage of households reporting to have delayed contacts with the health system for financial reasons was strongly related to the income level, with 27% of delay in the households of the lowest quintile versus 4%

This report also took into account further developments (SCF, 2003) Here the SCF points out that it does not change its view on caffeine.
Dans celui-ci, le SCF indique qu’il ne modifie pas son opinion sur la caféine.

However, it does not go on to assess the innocuousness of energy drinks as such. Owing to the absence of new data concerning chronic and acute exposure, the exposures used in this advisory report are based on an average daily chronic consumption of 0.5 can per person and a high chronic exposure of 1.4 cans for a regular consumer.
En l’absence de nouvelles informations sur l’exposition chronique et aiguë, les expositions utilisées dans l’avis ont reposé sur une consommation chronique journalière moyenne de 0,5 canette par personne et une exposition chronique élevée de 1,4 canettes pour un consommateur régulier.

- vs levonorgestrel * NR 1 NR 2,0 (1,4-2,8) 1,6 (1,0-2,4) 1,7 (0,7-3,9) 2,0 (1,3-3,0) *OR (95%-betrouwbaarheidsinterval) NR : not reported
- vs lévonorgestrel * 3,9 (1,4-10,6) NR 3,6 (2,9-4,6) 1 5,9 (1,7-21,0) NR 7,3 (5,3-10,0) 2,0 (1,4-2,8) 5,6 (3,7-8,4) 1,6 (1,0-2,4) 6,3 (2,9-13,7) 1,7 (0,7-3,9) 6,8 (4,7-10,0) 2,0 (1,3-3,0)

Odds ratio of NRT versus control: 1.67 Odds ratio of bupropion versus control: 2.1 Odds ratio of NRT+bupropion versus control: 2.65 From these Odds Ratios and information on the control 12-month quit rate in the comparator intervention (0.04 for brief advice and 0.10 for counselling), the 12-month quit rate of treatment is calculated: treated quit rate for brief advice+NRT: 0.0650 treated quit rate for brief advice+bupropion: 0.0805 treated quit rate for brief advice+bupropion+NRT: 0.0994 treated quit rate for counselling+NRT: 0.1565 treated quit rate for counselling+bupropion: 0.1892 treated quit rate for counselling+bupropion+NRT: 0.2275 spontaneous cessation rate: 0.01. lifetime relapse rate: 40% (range 30-50%). number of LYG per quitter: 2 (range 1-3). number of QALYs gained per quitter: 2.7 (range 1.35-4.05) not reported The table gives an overview of the assumptions with respect to costs and effects (quit rates) in the average scenario.
Odds ratio of NRT versus control: 1.67 Odds ratio of Buproprion versus control: 2.1 Odds ratio of NRT+Buproprion versus control: 2.65 From these Odds Ratios and information on the control 12-month quit rate in the comparator intervention (0.04 for brief advice and 0.10 for counselling), the 12-month quit rate of treatment is calculated: treated quit rate for brief advice+NRT: 0.0650 treated quit rate for brief advice+Buproprion: 0.0805 treated quit rate for brief advice+Buproprion+NRT: 0.0994 treated quit rate for counselling+NRT: 0.1565 treated quit rate for counselling+Buproprion: 0.1892 treated quit rate for counselling+Buproprion+NRT: 0.2275 spontaneous cessation rate: 0.01. lifetime relapse rate: 40% (range 30-50%). number of LYG per quitter: 2 (range 1-3). number of QALYs gained per quitter: 2.7 (range 1.35-4.05) not reported The table gives an overview of the assumptions with respect to costs and effects (quit rates) in the average scenario.

Treatment (both NRT and bupropion) lasts at least 1 month Retail price of NRT gum: not reported Retail price of NRT patch (3-month course): €354.54 (€, 2001) Retail price of NRT nasal spray (3-months course): €743.02 3% (range 0-5% in sensitivity analysis)
Treatment (both NRT and Buproprion) lasts at least 1 month Retail price of NRT gum: not reported Retail price of NRT patch (3-month course): €354.54 (€, 2001) Retail price of NRT nasal spray (3-months course): €743.02 3% (range 0-5% in sensitivity analysis)