Vertaling van "not in conformity with current belgian " (Nederlands → Frans) :

In 2002, the Council was consulted by the Food Inspection of the Ministry of Public Health concerning the high vitamin B12 content of this type of beverage, which is not in conformity with current Belgian legislation.
en 2002, le Conseil est consulté par l’Inspection des denrées alimentaires du Ministère de la Santé publique au sujet de la haute teneur en vitamine B12 de ce genre de boissons, non conformes à la législation belge en vigueur.

The issue of the rather high supplementary intake of group B vitamins - which raises questions at a nutritional level (AFSSA, 2006 and previous advisory reports of the Belgian Superior Health Council: see below) - is not discussed in this advisory report because, in spite of their unnecessarily high addition, they do not appear to cause any concern with respect to food safety.
La problématique des apports complémentaires assez élevés en vitamines du groupe B qui pose question au plan nutritionnel (AFSSA, 2006 et précédents avis du conseil Supérieur de la Santé de Belgique: voir ci-après) n’est pas considérée dans le présent avis, notamment parce qu’elle ne semble pas soulever d’objections au plan de la sécurité alimentaire même si ces apports sont inutilement trop élevés.

The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 444 is originally developed to Only for breast cancer and colon cancer, the US has higher survival rates assess the care needs of the elderly in institutions, and has later been than Belgium (data shown in documentation sheet in Supplement S1). To extended with instruments for different care settings and subgroups. In be able to distinguish the effect of early screening from the actual care, Belgium a national pilot project (the BelRAI) is ongoing, but is not yet implemented in all care settings: the assessment instruments for home care, relative survival rates should be compared across countries by stage, for long-term care facilities and acute care have already been adapted to information which is not yet available at international level. the Belgian situation (details in Appendix C).
Belgium a national pilot project (the BelRAI) is ongoing, but is not yet be able to distinguish the effect of early screening from the actual care, implemented in all care settings: the assessment instruments for home care, relative survival rates should be compared across countries by stage, for long-term care facilities and acute care have already been adapted to information which is not yet available at international level. the Belgian situation (details in Appendix C).

In this context the FAMHP supports provision of pharmacotherapeutic information to care providers and has concluded partnerships with independent organisations providing objective information about medicines (for instance the Belgian Centre for Pharmacotherapeutic Information – BCFI-CBIP and Project Farmaka, not-for-profit organisations). This process needs to take into consideration the expectations of healthcare professionals in terms of information content on the one hand, and the ease of access and consultation of the data on the other.
In this context the FAMHP supports provision of pharmacotherapeutic information to care providers and has concluded partnerships with independent organisations providing objective information about medicines (for instance the Belgian Centre for Pharmacotherapeutic Information – BCFI-CBIP and Project Farmaka, not-for-profit organisations). This process needs to take into consideration the expectations of healthcare professionals in terms of information content on the one hand, and the ease of access and consultation of the data on the other.

improvement of the information compared with the former situation when In the field of mental health, the currently available indicators do not reflect the medical workforce was estimated by the total number of licensed the recent major changes in the sector.
Current head counts of practising physicians undoubtedly represent an In the field of mental health, the currently available indicators do not reflect improvement of the information compared with the former situation when the recent major changes in the sector.

In the first scenario, there is no significant difference between the respondents with regard to the choice of the place where the information is given (inside or outside the existing decision-making organs) according their current/past membership (or not) of the INAMI – RIZIV organs.
Only 26% would choose to inform the patient outside the existing organs, and with a stronger preference on informing after the decision is taken. In the first scenario, there is no significant difference between the respondents with regard to the choice of the place where the information is given (inside or outside the existing decision-making organs) according their current/past membership (or not) of the INAMI – RIZIV organs.