Vertaling van "meta-analysis of randomised trials " (Nederlands → Frans) :

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000254.pub3. Vivekananthan DP, Penn MS, Sapp SK et al. Use of antioxidant vitamins for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of randomised trials.
Vivekananthan DP, Penn MS, Sapp SK et al. Use of antioxidant vitamins for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of randomised trials.

The antihypertensive and lipid lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT).JAMA 2002; 288: 2981-2997 (5) PAHOR M, PSATY B, ALERMAN M et al. Health outcomes associated with antagonists compared with other firstline antihypertensive therapies : a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
The antihypertensive and lipid lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2002 ; 288 : 2981-2997 (5) PAHOR M, PSATY B, ALERMAN M et al. Health outcomes associated with antagonists compared with other firstlineantihypertensive therapies : a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

active forms of vitamin D: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
forms of vitamin D: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Bespreking van: – Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Dawson-Hughes B, Stahelin HB et al. Fall prevention with supplemental and active forms of vitamin D: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2009; 339:b3692.
Analyse de: ‐ Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Dawson-Hughes B, Stahelin HB et al. Fall prevention with supplemental and active forms of

Boussageon R, Bejan-Angoulvant T, Saadatian M et al. Effect of intensive glucose lowering treatment on all cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and microvascular events in type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
DOI : 10.1002/ 14651858.CD008143.pub2. Boussageon R, Bejan-Angoulvant T, Saadatian M et al. Effect of intensive glucose lowering treatment on all cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and microvascular events in type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Chang A, Lasserson T, Kiljander T et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of gastro-oesophageal reflux interventions
10. Chang A, Lasserson T, Kiljander T et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of gastro-oesophageal reflux interventions

Winblad B, Jones RW, Wirth Y, Stöffler A, Möbius HJ. Memantine in moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
Winblad B, Jones RW, Wirth Y et al. Memantine in moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.

JAMA 2002 ; 288 :2981-2997 (6) PAHOR M, PSATY B, ALERMAN M et al. Health outcomes associated with antagonists compared with other first-line antihypertensive therapies : a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
JAMA 2002 ; 288 : 2981-2997 (6) PAHOR M, PSATY B, ALERMAN M et al. Health outcomes associated with antagonists compared with other first-line antihypertensive therapies : a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Bangalore S, Kumar S, Lobach I, Messerli F. Blood pressure targets in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus/impaired fasting glucose: observations from traditional and Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis of randomized trials.
The ACCORD Study Group. Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

scope and purpose: 10/12 stakeholders involvement: 8/16 rigour of development: 7/28 (methods available only on request) clarity and presentation: 8/16 applicability: 3/12 editorial independence: 2/8 question: adequate search: insufficient selection: unclear quality appraisal: fair data-extraction: not given characteristics of original studies: not given meta-analysis: no pooling Randomisation: good concealment of allocation: no Blinding of outcome assessors: unclear Baseline characteristics comparable: yes Follow-up: sufficient Intention-to-treat: yes Contamination: unclear
scope and purpose: 10/12 stakeholders involvement: 8/16 rigour of development: 7/28 (methods available only on request) clarity and presentation: 8/16 applicability: 3/12 editorial independence: 2/8 question: adequate search: insufficient selection: unclear quality appraisal: fair data-extraction: not given characteristics of original studies: not given meta-analysis: no pooling