Vertaling van "merger which is governed " (Nederlands → Frans) :

This merger, which is governed under the Swiss Merger Act, proposes a fixed exchange ratio of 2.80 Novartis shares for each remaining Alcon share.
Soumise à la loi fédérale suisse sur les fusions, cette fusion propose une parité fixe de 2,80 actions Novartis pour chacune des actions Alcon restantes.

Novartis believes this merger, which is governed under the Swiss Merger Act, is in the interest of all stakeholders and will provide the needed clarity on Alcon’s future.
Novartis est convaincu que cette fusion, qui sera réalisée conformément à la loi fédérale suisse sur la fusion, est dans l’intérêt de toutes les parties prenantes en apportant la clarté nécessaire à l’avenir d’Alcon.

This merger, which will be implemented under the Swiss Merger Act, is in the interest of all stakeholders and will provide the needed clarity on Alcon’s future.
Cette fusion, qui sera réalisée conformément à la loi fédérale sur la fusion, est dans l'intérêt de toutes les parties prenantes en clarifiant l’avenir d’Alcon.

1974 on the opening, transfer and merger of retail pharmacies Royal decree of 9 July 1984 on the provision of information and advertising relating to medicines Royal decree of 11 January 1993 determining the conditions under which medicines for human use may be supplied in sample form Royal decree of 7 April 1995 on the provision of information and advertising relating to medicines for human use Royal decree of 15 July 1997 on active implantable medical devices, transposing Directive 90/385 EEC (AIMD) Royal decree of 19 December 1997 on the control and analysis of the raw materials used by dispensing chemists Royal decree of 18 March 1999 on medical devices, transposing Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 (MDD) Royal decree of 11 July 2003 determining the conditions under which medicines for veterinary use may be supplied in sample form Law of 16 December 2004 modifying the regulations on combating abuses in the promotion of medicines Royal decree of 10 June 2006 establishing the report point referred to in Article 10, § 5, of the law of 25 March 1964 on medicines Royal decree of 23 November 2006 implementing Article 10, § 3, of the law of 25 March 1964 on medicines Royal decree of 25 February 2007 recognising the institutions referred to in Article 10 § 3 of the law of 25 March 1964 on medicines
1974 on the opening, transfer and merger of retail pharmacies Royal decree of 9 July 1984 on the provision of information and advertising relating to medicines Royal decree of 11 January 1993 determining the conditions under which medicines for human use may be supplied in sample form Royal decree of 7 April 1995 on the provision of information and advertising relating to medicines for human use Royal decree of 15 July 1997 on active implantable medical devices, transposing Directive 90/385 EEC (AIMD) Royal decree of 19 December 1997 on the control and analysis of the raw materials used by dispensing chemists Royal decree of 18 March 1999 on medical devices, transposing Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 (MDD) Royal decree of 11 July 2003 determining the conditions under which medicines for veterinary use may be supplied in sample form Law of 16 December 2004 modifying the regulations on combating abuses in the promotion of medicines Royal decree of 10 June 2006 establishing the report point referred to in Article 10, § 5, of the law of 25 March 1964 on medicines Royal decree of 23 November 2006 implementing Article 10, § 3, of the law of 25 March 1964 on medicines Royal decree of 25 February 2007 recognising the institutions referred to in Article 10 § 3 of the law of 25 March 1964 on medicines

We give priority to suppliers who share our values and meet our Third Party Code, which governs relations with contractors.
Nous travaillons en priorité avec des fournisseurs qui partagent nos valeurs et remplissent les exigences de notre Third Party Code, le texte qui régit nos relations avec nos partenaires commerciaux.

Average Wholesale Price litigation Claims have been brought against various pharmaceutical companies, including Novartis subsidiaries, alleging that they have fraudulently overstated the Average Wholesale Price and “best price”, which are, or have been, used by the US federal and state governments in the calculation of, respectively, Medicare reimbursements and Medicaid rebates.
Litige concernant le prix de gros moyen Des plaintes ont été déposées contre différentes sociétés pharmaceutiques, dont des filiales de Novartis, prétendant que celles-ci ont frauduleusement exagéré le prix de gros moyen (average wholesale price [AWP]) et le «meilleur prix» qui sont ou ont été utilisés par le gouvernement américain et des gouvernements d’Etat pour calculer les remboursements des médicaments dans le cadre du programme Medicare et les rabais dans celui de Medicaid.

The transaction, which is expected to be completed in 2010 or early 2011, is subject to certain closing conditions, including receipt of government and regulatory approvals in China.
Cette transaction, qui devrait être terminée en 2010 ou début 2011, est soumise à certaines conditions, notamment son acceptation par le gouvernement et l’approbation des autorités réglementaires de Chine.

The committee consists of representatives of all sectors involved in the areas for which the FAMHP is competent and representatives of the relevant federal government services.
The committee consists of representatives of all sectors involved in the areas for which the FAMHP is competent and representatives of the relevant federal government services.

The precise timing depends on the speed of progress of the selection procedure, which has been considerably held up by the negotiations over the formation of the new government.
The precise timing depends on the speed of progress of the selection procedure, which has been considerably held up by the negotiations over the formation of the new government.

Average Wholesale Price litigation Claims have been brought against various pharmaceutical companies, including NPC and certain Sandoz entities, alleging that they fraudulently overstated the Average Wholesale Price and “best price”, which are, or have been, used by the US federal and state governments in the calculation of, respectively, Medicare reimbursements and Medicaid rebates. In some cases, motions to dismiss or (cross-) motions for summary judgment have been made and are currently pending.
Litige concernant le prix de gros moyen Des plaintes ont été déposées contre différentes sociétés pharmaceutiques, dont NPC et certaines entités de Sandoz, au motif que celles-ci auraient frauduleusement exagéré le prix de gros moyen (average wholesale price [AWP]) et le «meilleur prix» qui sont ou ont été utilisés par le gouvernement fédéral américain et des gouvernements d’Etat pour calculer les remboursements des médicaments dans le cadre du programme Medicare et les rabais dans celui de Medicaid.