Vertaling van "long-term fluctuations in some countries " (Nederlands → Frans) :

Indeed, this would require the explaining of a whole series of paradoxical empirical results: the suicide rate varies considerably from one country to another; it is subjected to long-term fluctuations in some countries, but remains remarkably stable when compared to other countries; in times of war the rate goes down, etc.
Il faudrait expliquer toute une série de résultats empiriques paradoxaux: le taux de suicides varie beaucoup à l’échelle des nations; il est soumis à des fluctuations sur le long terme dans certains pays, mais comparé à d’autres pays, il reste étonnamment stable; en période de guerre le taux baisse, etc.

Some of the criteria for the assessment are: “destigmatising effect”, “objectivity and credibility”, “clarity and understandability”, “long-term interest”, “newsworthiness”, “title, reflection of its content”.
Quelques critères d’évaluation sont: « effet déstigmatisant », « objectivité et crédibilité », « clair et compréhensible », « intérêt à long terme », « apport d’éléments nouveaux » « titre, reflet de son contenu ».

The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 444 is originally developed to Only for breast cancer and colon cancer, the US has higher survival rates assess the care needs of the elderly in institutions, and has later been than Belgium (data shown in documentation sheet in Supplement S1). To extended with instruments for different care settings and subgroups. In be able to distinguish the effect of early screening from the actual care, Belgium a national pilot project (the BelRAI) is ongoing, but is not yet implemented in all care settings: the assessment instruments for home care, relative survival rates should be compared across countries by stage, for long-term care facilities and acute care have already been adapted to information which is not yet available at international level. the Belgian situation (details in Appendix C).
Belgium a national pilot project (the BelRAI) is ongoing, but is not yet be able to distinguish the effect of early screening from the actual care, implemented in all care settings: the assessment instruments for home care, relative survival rates should be compared across countries by stage, for long-term care facilities and acute care have already been adapted to information which is not yet available at international level. the Belgian situation (details in Appendix C).