Selon la Cour, le cœur du problème se situait au niveau de l'aptitude de la demanderesse (la mère) « to obtain recognition of Mr G. as the biological father of the stillborn child, notwithstanding the legal presumption that the husband was the father of the child born within three hundred days of the dissolution of the marriage.
De kern van deze zaak lag volgens het Hof in « the applicant's (de moeder) ability to obtain recognition of Mr G. as the biological father of the stillborn child, notwithstanding the legal presumption that the husband was the father of the child born within three hundred days of the dissolution of the marriage.
