L'idée que j'émettais, c'est qu'au lieu d'ajouter l'orientation sexuelle à la liste figurant à l'article 318, qui porte, si je l'ai bien lu, sur l'incitation à ces crimes qui conduiraient à des actes de génocide, que l'article 319, qui vise l'incitation à la haine qui conduirait à des violations de la paix, ce qui pourrait comprendre diverses choses, pourrait, du point de vue des probabilités de succès des poursuites, atteindre son but plus efficacement en répétant la liste des groupes identifiables.
My suggestion was that rather than adding sexual orientation to the list in section 318, which deals, if I read it correctly, with the incitement of crimes which would lead to acts of genocide, that section 319, which deals with incitement of hatred which would lead to breaches of the peace — which could include any number of things, could more effectively — in respect of the likelihood of the success of prosecution, which would then be absent the onus of genocide, be achieved by restating the list of identifiable groups.
