Disons autrement ce que j'ai déjà dit. Si le ministre appuie le rapport Sims, comme il l'affirme, pourquoi exiger la preuve que le litige vise à désyndicaliser le milieu de travail plutôt que de parler simplement d'objectifs de négociation légitimes?
To rephrase what I said, if the minister supports the Sims report, as he says he does, why do we need a change to that language when the language indicates that the dispute must be demonstrated to be for the purposes of undermining union representative capacity rather than for the purpose of legitimate bargaining objectives?