Certes, la Cour suprême insiste sur l'importance des principes constitutionnels non écrits, mais, modifier le pouvoir souverain du Parlement, modifier le texte formel de la Constitution, est-ce vraiment, comme le dit la Cour suprême, combler les vides de la Constitution?
The Court, of course, described the importance of these unwritten constitutional principles, but does amending Parliament's sovereign power or the formal wording of the Constitution truly amount to filling the gaps in the Constitution, as the Supreme Court suggests?