Ce qui rend votre attitude presque contradictoire, c’est justement que ce traité constitutionnel implique davantage les Parlements nationaux, tout en précisant les limites et clarifiant les choses. Or, l’opposition de ceux-là mêmes qui réclament davantage de clarté, de participation et de subsidiarité rend cette question encore beaucoup plus difficile, puisque c’est précisément la reconnaissance de la nécessité d’une plus grande implication du public qui en a motivé l’idée de départ.
What makes your attitude almost antagonistic is that this constitutional treaty is one that gives the n
ational parliaments more of a say, setting boundaries more clearly and achieving clarity, and the opposition to this constitutional treaty on the part of those who want greater clarity, more of a say, and more subsidiarity, makes matters so much more difficult for us since our
recognition of the need for greater public involvement
...[+++] was the very reason why it was drafted in the first place. 
