Si j'appliquais sa logique, qui justifierait la convocation de 62 ou 65 p. 100 de témoins en faveur du registre des armes d'épaule, dans un procès pour meurtre qualifié — je ne crois pas trop me tromper, même si j'improvise, en disant que 100 p. 100 des Canadiens sont contre le meurtre qualifié —, cela signifierait que tous les témoins seraient appelés par la Couronne et que la défense n'en aurait aucun pour appuyer sa thèse.
Using his logic that this would justify having 62% or 65% of the witnesses who favour the long-gun registry, if we were to apply that to any other criminal or civil procedure that would mean that in a capital murder trial I'm pretty confident, although I am making this up, that 100% of Canadians are against capital murder that 100% of the witnesses would be called by the crown and the defence would not be able to call any. If that is Mr. Comartin's idea of a fair hearing and a fair trial, I'd be happy to hear that when he has the floor.