Vertaling van "para a protecção " (Frans → Engels) :

TERMINOLOGIE

planche à neige paralympique [ para snowboard | para-snowboard ]
para-snowboarding

Ley para Promover la Inversión Mexicana y Regular la Inversión Extranjera [ Loi visant à promouvoir l'investissement mexicain et à réglementer l'investissement étranger ]
Ley para Promover la Inversión Mexicana y Regular la Inversión Extranjera [ Law to Promote Mexican Investment and Regulate Foreign Investment ]

acide para-amino-salicylique | P.A.S.
Para-Amino-Salicylic Acid | P.A.S.

enveloppe à flancs para
gum side tire

Glandes para-urétrales
Paraurethral glands

virus para-influenza humainses
Human parainfluenza viruses

virus para-influenza humains 4
Human parainfluenza 4 virus

virus para-influenza humains 2
Human parainfluenza virus 2

hernie para-ombilicale
paraumbilical hernia

hernie:hiatale (œsophagienne) (par glissement) | para-œsophagienne
hiatus hernia (oesophageal)(sliding) paraoesophageal hernia

IN-CONTEXT TRANSLATIONS

Parties requérantes: Liga para a Protecção da Natureza (LPN) (représentants: P. Vinagre e Silva et L. Rossi, advogadas), République de Finlande (représentants: J. Heliskoski, M. Pere et M. J. Leppo, agentes),
Appellants: Liga para a Protecção da Natureza (LPN) (represented by: P. Vinagre e Silva and L. Rossi, advogadas), Republic of Finland (represented by: J. Heliskoski, M. Pere and J. Leppo, acting as Agents)

Pourvois formées contre l'arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 9 septembre 2011, LPN/Commission (T-29/08), par lequel le Tribunal a rejeté le recours introduit par LPN en ce qu'il porte sur des documents et des parties de documents auxquels l'accès a été refusé à la Liga para a Protecção da Natureza (LPN) dans la décision SG.E.3/MIB/psi D(2008) 8639 de la Commission, du 24 octobre 2008.
Appeals brought against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 September 2011 in Case T-29/08 LPN v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed the action brought by LPN in so far as it relates to documents and parts of documents to which access was refused to the Liga para a Protecção da Natureza (LPN) in Commission Decision SG.E.3/MIB/psi D(2008) 8639 of 24 October 2008.

Dans l’affaire T-29/08, Liga para Protecção da Natureza (LPN)/Commission, le Tribunal a, en rendant son arrêt, violé l’article 58 du statut de la Cour de justice dans la mesure où il n’a pas annulé la décision litigieuse de la Commission du 22 novembre 2007 en ce qui concerne les documents et parties de documents auxquels LPN s’est vu refuser l’accès par décision du 24 octobre 2008.
In Case T-29/08 Liga para Protecção da Natureza (LPN) v European Commission, the General Court infringed Article 58 of the Statute of the Court of Justice because it did not annul the contested decision of the Commission of 22 November 2007 in so far as the LPN was refused access to documents and parts of documents by the Commission decision of 24 October 2008.

Partie requérante: Liga para a Protecção da Natureza (LPN) (représentant: P. Vinagre e Silva, avocate)
Appellant: Liga para a Protecção da Natureza (LPN) (represented by: P. Vinagre e Silva, advogada)

Autres parties à la procédure: Liga para Protecção da Natureza (LPN), Commission européenne, Royaume de Danemark, Royaume de Suède
Other parties to the proceedings: Liga para Protecção da Natureza (LPN), European Commission, Kingdom of Denmark, Kingdom of Sweden

Persistem, no entanto, graves falhas quanto à protecção dos utilizadores e consumidores, no que diz respeito à protecção dos seus dados pessoais e à garantia de qualidade do serviço prestado ou produto adquirido.
There remain, however, serious failings in terms of the protection of users and consumers, in terms of the protection of their personal data, and guaranteeing the quality of service provided or product purchased.

Então, porque é que a maioria das forças políticas representadas no PE, que correspondem à maioria representada na Comissão e no Conselho da UE: não adoptam o regulamento "fabricado em"? ; não aplicam aos produtos importados os mesmos requisitos de segurança e de protecção que são exigidos aos produtos produzidos na UE?; não utilizam o quadro financeiro 2007-2013 para defender a produção e o emprego, apoiando as PME?
So why is it that the majority of political forces represented in Parliament, which correspond to the majority represented in the Commission and the EU Council, do not adopt the regulation on origin marking, do not apply to imported products the same safety and protection standards required of products produced in the EU, do not use the 2007-2013 Financial Framework to protect production and employment, supporting small and medium-sized enterprises?

O presente relatório, apesar de referir tais factos, não avança com propostas que permitam reforçar a protecção dos utilizadores e a qualidade do serviço prestado, a partir da utilização de um serviço de cariz iminentemente público, como são as comunicações.
This report, despite mentioning these facts, does not put forward proposals that would make it possible to enhance user protection and the quality of the service provided, based on the use of a service as imminently public as communications.