Par conséquent, si nous additionnions 25 et 70, nous finirions par bloquer un produit moyen qui souvent, - et aussi, disons-le, de par sa nature, sa nouveauté et sa créativité - ne peut durer autant, pas au-delà de la durée de vie d’un homme, raison pour laquelle il me semble que 25 ans suffisent.
Thus, if we were to add the 25 years to the 70 years, we would end up preventing the modification of a common product which often – and also, so to speak, by its very nature and taking into account novelty and creativity – cannot last very long, not beyond the lifetime of a human being, for example, and therefore a ceiling of 25 years would seem reasonable.