En effet, le juge en chef Lamer manifeste son désaccord, plus loin, avec un troisième argument qui a été invoqué, soit que, si la disposition n'est pas incorporée, les principes constitutionnels le sont peut-être, eux, et ils auraient force de loi au Canada.
They differed as to their approach to how parliamentary privilege should be invoked, because Chief Justice Lamer went on to disagree with a third argument that was put forward, which was that if the provision doesn't come in, maybe the constitutional principles do, and the constitutional principles would have force of law in Canada.