Quatrièm
e moyen, tiré de la violation de la foi due aux actes de procédure et du principe de l’appréciation des recours en fonction des éléments existants lors de l’adoption de l’acte attaqué, en ce que le TFP a considéré, au point 77 de son ordonnance, que le requérant fondait son argumentation tirée du principe d’égalité de
traitement sur les conséquences de la décision litigieuse et l’a en tout cas rejetée sur la base de ces conséquences, ainsi que violation de l’obligation de motivation, du principe de l’interprétation des disposi
...[+++]tions statutaires conformément au principe d’égalité et de ce dernier principe, en ce que le Tribunal n’a pas, aux points 77 ainsi que 78 à 80 de son ordonnance, répondu à suffisance de droit à son argumentation.Fourth plea in law, alleging (i) infringement of the requirement that pleadings are to be construed in accordance with their actual terms and of the principle that actions are to be assessed
on the basis of the information existing at the time the contested measure was adopted, in that the CST took the view, in paragraph 77 of its order, that the appellant based his arguments, derived from the principle of equa
l treatment, on the consequences of the contested decision and rejected them in any event on the basis of those consequences;
...[+++] and (ii) infringement of the obligation to state reasons, the principle that the provisions of the Staff Regulations are to be interpreted in accordance with the principle of equality and the principle of equality itself, in that the CST, in paragraphs 77 and 78 to 80 of its order, failed to respond to the requisite legal standard to the appellant’s arguments.
