Plus logique encore s'avère le projet de recommandation, accepté ensuite par l'institution, qui stigmatise le report sine die, au prétexte de vouloir embrasser la question de fond globalement, d'une procédure d'infraction en application de l'article 226 contre le Danemark, défaillant en matière de taxation des véhicules automoteurs (p. 103).
Even more cogent was the Ombudsman's draft recommendation, which was subsequently accepted by the Institution, criticising the indefinite postponement, on the grounds that the Commission wanted to address the underlying question globally, of infringement proceedings under Article 226 against Denmark, which had failed to comply with its obligations in relation to motor vehicle tax (page 103).