Traduction de «Spécification AREA » (Français → Anglais) :

TERMINOLOGIE

spécification AREA
AREA specification

examiner les spécifications formelles des TIC | inspecter les spécifications formelles des TIC | contrôler les spécifications formelles des TIC | vérifier les spécifications formelles des TIC
verify formal ICT specifications | verify formal IT specifications

analyser les spécifications du logiciel ou système | évaluer les spécifications du logiciel | analyser les spécifications du logiciel | examiner les spécifications du logiciel
analyse software or system specifications | analyse software specifications

spécifications du WAP [ normes du WAP | normes WAP | spécifications WAP | spécifications du protocole WAP | spécifications du protocole pour les applications sans fil ]
WAP specifications [ wireless application protocol specifications | WAP standards ]

spécifications de l'Association canadienne de normalisation [ spécifications de la CSA | spécifications de l'ACNOR ]
Canadian Standards Association specifications [ CSA specifications ]

spécification de travail initial | spécification initiale du travail
initial work specification

carburant répondant aux spécifications | carburant aux spécifications
on-specification fuel | on-spec fuel

Les feuilles de style en cascade, niveau 2 Spécification CSS2 [ Spécification CSS2 ]
Cascading Style Sheets, level 2 CSS2 Specification [ CSS2 Specification ]

spécification | spécification technique | standard
specification | technical specification

définir des spécifications pour des salles de séchage
set up specifications in a curing room | set up specifications in a tempering room | set up specifications in a preserving room | set up specifications in curing room

TRADUCTIONS EN CONTEXTE

– vu le rapport Nordregio 2009:2 («Strong, Specific and Promising – Towards a Vision for the Northern Sparsely Populated Areas in 2020 »),
– having regard to the Nordregio Report 2009:2 (‘Strong, Specific and Promising – Towards a Vision for the Northern Sparsely Populated Areas in 2020’),

– vu le rapport Nordregio 2009:2 ("Strong, Specific and Promising – Towards a Vision for the Northern Sparsely Populated Areas in 2020"),
– having regard to the Nordregio Report 2009:2 (‘Strong, Specific and Promising – Towards a Vision for the Northern Sparsely Populated Areas in 2020’),

Ces détenus ont les mêmes droits et sont soumis aux mêmes conditions, à moins que ce ne soit pas possible. C'est ce qui est écrit dans le libellé anglais de l'article: « limitations specific to the administrative segregation area ».
Well, it's great to say you have rights if you have rights to everything except what you don't have because those limitations are specific to the administrative segregation area.

Voici un autre problème que nous voyons dans cet article. Si on envisage l'article anglais dans son ensemble, en particulier le passage qui figure à la page 36.L'article est libellé comme suit: « An inmate in administrative segregation has the same rights and conditions of confinement as other inmates, except for those that.cannot be enjoyed due to limitations specific to the administrative segregation area..».
One of the other problems that we have with this is if you look at the clause as a whole, particularly on page 36, the clause says: “An inmate in administrative segregation has the same rights and conditions of confinement as other inmates, except for those that.cannot be enjoyed due to limitations specific to the administrative segregation area..”.

– vu le rapport Nordregio 2009:2 intitulé «Strong, Specific and Promising – Towards a Vision for the Northern Sparsely Populated Areas in 2020»,
– having regard to the Nordregio Report 2009:2, ‘Strong, Specific and Promising – Towards a Vision for the Northern Sparsely Populated Areas in 2020’,

– vu le rapport Nordregio 2009:2 intitulé "Strong, Specific and Promising – Towards a Vision for the Northern Sparsely Populated Areas in 2020",
– having regard to the Nordregio Report 2009:2, ‘Strong, Specific and Promising – Towards a Vision for the Northern Sparsely Populated Areas in 2020’,

[8] 2001 Specific Monitoring Report on European Research Area Activities (ERA)
[8] 2001 Specific Monitoring Report on European Research Area Activities (ERA).

Recalls its conclusion of 29 April 1993, according to which detailed criteria and mechanisms should be established for cost-effective implementation and improved management of the Framework Programme in order to ensure that its objectives are fully met; reaffirms also its emphasis on the need for the improvement of procedures for systematic, independent and timely evaluation of the Framework Programme; 2. Welcomes in this respect the initiatives undertaken by the Commission with a view to improving the management of the EC research programmes and encourages the Commission to develop further such initiatives in time for the implementation of the 4th Framework Programme; 3. Emphasizes that procedures and tools for programme implementation should as far as possible be simplified and harmonised in order to facilitate participation in Community research programmes, particularly by SMEs, and to allow for smooth, transparent and timely implementation of the Framework Programme; welcomes in this respect the circulation by the Commission of information bulletins on a regular basis; 4. Would welcome in particular, without prejudice to the quality and transparency of the selection procedure, improvements in specific areas, such as the shortening of delays between deadlines for receipt of proposals and start of selected projects and the provision of information to applicants on non-selected proposals; 5. Takes note of the Commission's intention to assess in further detail the possible benefits and disadvantages of decentralised management and possible further concrete measures that could be taken in this field, so as to enable Council to take a view on this issue as soon as possible; 6. Considers that possible new types of activities, for example thematic networks of excellence, concertation networks and consortia for integrated projects, as proposed by the Commission, need to be clarified further; 7. Reaffirms the importance of the role of programme committees in the m ...
Recalls its conclusion of 29 April 1993, according to which detailed criteria and mechanisms should be established for cost-effective implementation and improved management of the Framework Programme in order to ensure that its objectives are fully met; reaffirms also its emphasis on the need for the improvement of procedures for systematic, independent and timely evaluation of the Framework Programme; 2. Welcomes in this respect the initiatives undertaken by the Commission with a view to improving the management of the EC research programmes and encourages the Commission to develop further such initiatives in time for the implementation of the Fourth Framework Programme; 3. Emphasizes that procedures and tools for programme implementation should as far as possible be simplified and harmonized in order to facilitate participation in Community research programmes, particularly by SMEs, and to allow for smooth, transparent and timely implementation of the Framework Programme; welcomes in this respect the circulation by the Commission of information bulletins on a regular basis; 4. Would welcome in particular, without prejudice to the quality and transparency of the selection procedure, improvements in specific areas, such as the shortening of delays between deadlines for receipt of proposals and start of selected projects and the provision of information to applicants on non-selected proposals; 5. Takes note of the Commission's intention to assess in further detail the possible benefits and disadvantages of decentralized management and possible further concrete measures that could be taken in this field, so as to enable Council to take a view on this issue as soon as possible; 6. Considers that possible new types of activities, for example thematic networks of excellence, concertation networks and consortia for integrated projects, as proposed by the Commission, need to be clarified further; 7. Reaffirms the importance of the role of programme committees in th ...

- EAEC specific research programmes will be focussed on - Nuclear fission safety which will contain the following research areas - Reactor Safety, - Safeguards and Fissile Materials Management - Radioactive Waste Management and - Actinides in Nuclear Fuel Cycle Safety. - Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion Amongst the new activities requested by Commission services as Scientific and Technical Support are: - European Centre for Alternative Testing Methods (alternative to vivisection), to be implemented by the JRC Environment Institute (Ispra), - On-Site Laboratories for Nuclear Safeguards Analyses, to be operated by the JRC Institute for Transuranium Elements (Karlsruhe). The total for these projects is estimated at 190 Mioecus for the 1992- 1994 period.
- EAEC specific research programmes will be focused on - Nuclear fission safety, with the following research areas - Reactor safety - Safeguards and fissile materials management - Radioactive waste management and - Actinides in nuclear fuel cycle safety - Controlled thermonuclear fusion Amongst the new activities requested by Commission services as scientific and technical support are: - European Centre for Alternative Testing Methods (alternative to vivisection), to be implemented by the JRC Environment Institute (Ispra) - On-Site Laboratories for Nuclear Safeguards Analyses, to be operatered by the JRC Institute for Transuranium Elements (Karlsruhe) The total expenditure for these projects is estimated at ECU 190 million for the 1992-1994 period.