Vertaling van "you had three travelling exhibitions covering $400 million " (Engels → Frans) :

the situation is that it is—and I had not understood this—cumulative, so that indeed if you had three travelling exhibitions covering $400 million each, let's say, and none of them had any claims and they came to terms six months into the year, it would still only leave $300 million out of the $1.5 billion for the rest of the year.
le fait est que c'est—et je ne l'avais pas compris ainsi—cumulatif. Ainsi, s'il y avait effectivement trois expositions itinérantes représentant 400 millions de dollars chacune, par exemple, qu'aucune d'entre elles ne donnait lieu à une demande d'indemnisation et qu'elles prenaient fin au bout de six mois, cela ne laisserait tout de même que 300 millions des 1,5 milliard de dollars pour le reste de l'année.

To give you an example, when the federal funding through the museums assistance program was at $14 million, we had twenty travelling exhibitions.
Pour vous donner un exemple, lorsque le programme d'aide aux musées du fédéral était de 14 millions de dollars, nous avions vingt expositions itinérantes.

The reason is that if we take the most significant difference between these reports between report number one and report number three—particularly on the minimum threshold— As I recall the discussion, I may even have been a proponent in the discussion of taking a look at the fact that if you had the $50,000 to $500,000, it would give an opportunity for smaller exhibits possibly to be able to travel.
Si je me souviens bien de la discussion, j'ai peut-être même suggéré qu'un montant entre 50 000 et 500 000 $ permettrait le déplacement des petites exhibitions.