The experience abroad certainly shows that if there is a decision in the first instance that says yes, there was fraud, or no, there wasn't fraud, and there is an appeal and the appeal disagrees with that and says there wasn't fraud, or yes, there was fraud, perhaps even there the perception of fairness diminishes in the public eye.
L'expérience des autres pays démontre clairement que, si un arrêt de première instance conclut à la fraude mais que la décision est renversée en appel, le public a tendance à être moins convaincu de la justesse du processus.