Seeing a chance of getting consensus on moving forward, I just want to make the point that the only reason for this motion is the prorogation, and that had we not prorogued we wouldn't actually need this motion, because it's continuing the study that we were in the process of doing.
Voyant que nous pourrions être d'accord pour aller de l'avant, je veux simplement souligner que la seule raison de cette motion est la prorogation. Sans la prorogation, nous n'aurions pas besoin de la motion, qui s'inscrit dans la continuité de l'étude que nous menions.