Vertaling van "systematic evaluation presented " (Engels → Frans) :

TERMINOLOGIE

systematic call presentation
présentation systématique d'appel

Management Committee on the Systematic Evaluation of Existing Chemicals
Comité des gestion sur l'évaluation systématique des produits chimiques existants

Committee of governmental experts to evaluate the present structure of the secretariat in the administrative, finance and personnel areas
Comité d'experts gouvernementaux chargé d'évaluer la structure actuelle du Secrétariat dans les domaines de l'administration, des finances et du personnel

Committee of Governmental Experts to Evaluate the Present Structure of the Secretariat in the Administrative, Finance and Personnel Areas
Comité d'experts gouvernementaux chargé d'évaluer la structure actuelle du Secrétariat dans les domaines de l'administration, des finances et du personnel

IN-CONTEXT TRANSLATIONS

The only systematic evaluation presented by the French authorities in the EDF memo of 18 February 1997 (recital 92) is general and confined to the statutory remuneration on the capital contributions, including those pre-dating the restructuring of EDF's balance sheet, but excluding, for example, remuneration on other capital or own funds.
La seule évaluation systématique présentée par les autorités françaises contenue dans la note d'EDF du 18 février 1997 (considérant 92) est générale et limitée à la rémunération réglementaire appliquée aux dotations en capital, y compris celles antérieures à la restructuration du bilan d'EDF, sans inclure, par exemple, la rémunération du capital hors dotations ou la rémunération des fonds propres.

To this end and reflecting the Stockholm Programme and the Stockholm Programme Action Plan[4], the European Council’s June Conclusions invited the Commission to present an evaluation of the Global Approach to Migration and set a path towards a more consistent, systematic and strategic policy framework for the EU’s relations with all relevant non-EU countries.
À cette fin et conformément au programme de Stockholm et au plan d'action mettant en œuvre celui-ci[4], les conclusions du Conseil européen de juin 2011 ont invité la Commission à présenter une évaluation de l'approche globale de la question des migrations et à s'employer à rendre plus cohérent, plus systématique et plus stratégique le cadre politique régissant les relations de l'Union avec tous les pays tiers concernés.

‘data protection impact assessment’ means a systematic process for evaluating the potential impact of risks where processing operations are likely to present specific risks to the rights and freedoms of data subjects by virtue of their nature, their scope or their purposes to be to carried by the controller or processor or the processor acting on the controller’s behalf.
par «analyse de l’impact sur la protection des données», on entend un processus systématique à charge du responsable du traitement des données, du sous-traitant ou du sous-traitant agissant pour le compte du responsable, qui vise à évaluer l’impact potentiel des risques spécifiques que les opérations de traitement des données peuvent faire peser, en raison de leur nature, de leur portée ou de leurs finalités, sur les droits et libertés des personnes concernées.

‘data protection impact assessment’ means a systematic process for evaluating the potential impact of risks where processing operations are likely to present specific risks to the rights and freedoms of data subjects by virtue of their nature, their scope or their purposes to be to carried by the controller or processor or the processor acting on the controller’s behalf;
par «analyse de l’impact sur la protection des données», on entend un processus systématique à charge du responsable du traitement des données, du sous-traitant ou du sous-traitant agissant pour le compte du responsable, qui vise à évaluer l’impact potentiel des risques spécifiques que les opérations de traitement des données peuvent faire peser, en raison de leur nature, de leur portée ou de leurs finalités, sur les droits et libertés des personnes concernées;

The Commission is invited to present its evaluation of the Global Approach to Migration, setting the path towards a more consistent, systematic and strategic policy framework for our relations with all relevant third counties, and including concrete proposals for the development of the Union's key partnerships, giving priority to the Union's neighbourhood as a whole.
29. La Commission est invitée à présenter son évaluation de l'approche globale sur la question des migrations, ouvrant la voie à un cadre politique plus cohérent, plus systématique et plus stratégique pour nos relations avec l'ensemble des pays tiers concernés et comprenant des propositions concrètes en vue de renforcer les principaux partenariats de l'Union, la priorité allant à l'ensemble du voisinage de l'UE.

(14) In accordance with the opinion of the SCF, the evaluation of the substances by the SCF should follow the procedure applied by JECFA, which is the most updated and systematic procedure presently applied.
(14) Conformément à l'avis qu'il a formulé, le CSAH devra évaluer les substances selon la procédure appliquée par le CMEAA, qui est la plus moderne et la plus systématique actuellement utilisée.

22. Calls on the Commission to produce, at an early date, a systematic comparative assessment of the liberalisation of public services in terms of the effects on employment, territorial cohesion and the quality of services; points to the fact that services of general interest, particularly those which manage scarce resources or natural monopolies, have a major role to play in putting sustainable development into effect; encourages the Commission, on the basis of the Council conclusions presented at the Laeken summit, to draw up a proposal for a framework directive, based on Article 95 of the EC Treaty, on services of general interest; expects the framework directive to determine the Community principles underlying services of general interest, at an appropriate level of subsidiarity, to prescribe and define the Community principles for regulating them in a democratic and transparent manner, to ensure the active involvement of citizens and users in the process of defining, evaluating and assessing their role, and to institutionalise a common, pluralist evaluation procedure;
22. invite la Commission à produire rapidement une évaluation systématique et contradictoire des libéralisations des services publics au regard de leurs conséquences pour l'emploi, la cohésion territoriale et la qualité des prestations; fait observer que les services d'intérêt général, en particulier ceux qui touchent à la gestion de ressources peu abondantes ou de monopoles naturels, ont un rôle important à jouer pour assurer le développement durable; encourage la Commission, sur la base des conclusions du Conseil présentées au Sommet de Laeken, à préparer une proposition de directive-cadre, fondée sur l'article 95 du traité CE, concernant les services d'intérêt général. Attend que la directive-cadre fixe les principes communautaires sur lesquels reposent les services d'intérêt général, et ce à un niveau de subsidiarité approprié, qu'elle prescrive et définisse les principes communautaires d'une réglementation démocratique et transparente, qu'elle assure une participation active des citoyens et des usagers au processus de définition, d'évaluation et d'appréciation des missions, et qu'elle institutionnalise une procédure commune et pluraliste d'évaluation;

Project and programme evaluation reports are presently made available for consultation [21] on a systematic basis, such as by theme or geographical area.
Actuellement les rapports d'évaluation des projets et des programmes peuvent être consultés systématiquement [21], par exemple par thème ou par zone géographique.

Recalls its conclusion of 29 April 1993, according to which detailed criteria and mechanisms should be established for cost-effective implementation and improved management of the Framework Programme in order to ensure that its objectives are fully met; reaffirms also its emphasis on the need for the improvement of procedures for systematic, independent and timely evaluation of the Framework Programme; 2. Welcomes in this respect the initiatives undertaken by the Commission with a view to improving the management of the EC research programmes and encourages the Commission to develop further such initiatives in time for the implementation of the Fourth Framework Programme; 3. Emphasizes that procedures and tools for programme implementation should as far as possible be simplified and harmonized in order to facilitate participation in Community research programmes, particularly by SMEs, and to allow for smooth, transparent and timely implementation of the Framework Programme; welcomes in this respect the circulation by the Commission of information bulletins on a regular basis; 4. Would welcome in particular, without prejudice to the quality and transparency of the selection procedure, improvements in specific areas, such as the shortening of delays between deadlines for receipt of proposals and start of selected projects and the provision of information to applicants on non-selected proposals; 5. Takes note of the Commission's intention to assess in further detail the possible benefits and disadvantages of decentralized management and possible further concrete measures that could be taken in this field, so as to enable Council to take a view on this issue as soon as possible; 6. Considers that possible new types of activities, for example thematic networks of excellence, concertation networks and consortia for integrated projects, as proposed by the Commission, need to be clarified further; 7. Reaffirms the importance of the role of programme committees in th ...
Recalls its conclusion of 29 April 1993, according to which detailed criteria and mechanisms should be established for cost-effective implementation and improved management of the Framework Programme in order to ensure that its objectives are fully met; reaffirms also its emphasis on the need for the improvement of procedures for systematic, independent and timely evaluation of the Framework Programme; 2. Welcomes in this respect the initiatives undertaken by the Commission with a view to improving the management of the EC research programmes and encourages the Commission to develop further such initiatives in time for the implementation of the 4th Framework Programme; 3. Emphasizes that procedures and tools for programme implementation should as far as possible be simplified and harmonised in order to facilitate participation in Community research programmes, particularly by SMEs, and to allow for smooth, transparent and timely implementation of the Framework Programme; welcomes in this respect the circulation by the Commission of information bulletins on a regular basis; 4. Would welcome in particular, without prejudice to the quality and transparency of the selection procedure, improvements in specific areas, such as the shortening of delays between deadlines for receipt of proposals and start of selected projects and the provision of information to applicants on non-selected proposals; 5. Takes note of the Commission's intention to assess in further detail the possible benefits and disadvantages of decentralised management and possible further concrete measures that could be taken in this field, so as to enable Council to take a view on this issue as soon as possible; 6. Considers that possible new types of activities, for example thematic networks of excellence, concertation networks and consortia for integrated projects, as proposed by the Commission, need to be clarified further; 7. Reaffirms the importance of the role of programme committees in the m ...