In the case of Mr. Eskridge, because it's raised at almost every single one, the fact that he is opposed to same-sex marriage has a series of arguments, some of which may be valid, some of which may not I'm not going to comment and it's pointed out every single time that his studies or arguments are raised that he's a homosexual.
Dans le cas de M. Eskridge, dont on parle pratiquement à chaque réunion, il s'oppose au mariage gai en faisant valoir des arguments dont certains peuvent être valables et d'autres pas—je ne vais pas me prononcer là-dessus—et on rajoute chaque fois qu'il est homosexuel.