I agree with you that it's not perfect, but I think it's pretty good, and if we're talking about spending more resources to protect species, my position is those resources would be better spent directly on species conservation rather than on administering, interpreting, and enforcing this law you're proposing as currently written.
Si nous voulons consacrer plus de ressources à la protection des espèces, alors il faudrait les affecter directement à la conservation des espèces, et non à l'administration, à l'interprétation et à l'application de la loi, dans sa forme actuelle.