Vertaling van "speaker to explain how he could begin his remarks " (Engels → Frans) :

Mr. Speaker, I would like the previous speaker to explain how he could begin his remarks by saying that amnesty is necessary to convince more people to comply with the law, then go on to say that the law they would be complying with is no good and should be eliminated.
Monsieur le Président, j'aimerais que l'orateur explique comment il peut commencer sa présentation en disant que l'amnistie est nécessaire pour permettre de convaincre plus de gens de se conformer à la loi, pour ensuite dire que la loi à laquelle ils se conformeraient n'est pas bonne et qu'elle devrait être éliminée.

Mr. René Laurin (Joliette, BQ): Mr. Speaker, I would like the hon. government House leader to explain what he means by his remarks.
M. René Laurin (Joliette, BQ): Monsieur le Président, j'aimerais que l'honorable leader du gouvernement à la Chambre nous explique ce qu'il entend par ses propos.

Could the minister explain how he can view his bill as a public safety bill when it does not meet the tenets of public safety?
Le ministre peut-il expliquer comment il peut considérer que son projet de loi concerne la sécurité publique alors qu'il porte sur tout sauf la sécurité publique?

Before giving us assurances and telling us about any future action of his, will the minister explain how he could let things get to this point before taking action?
Avant de nous donner ses assurances et ses actions futures, le ministre peut-il nous expliquer comment il a pu laisser aller les choses à ce point avant d'agir?

Could he explain in his reply how the Summit will reflect our concern and our refusal to agree that Estonia is the cause of this crisis?
Le ministre pourrait-il expliquer dans sa réponse comment le sommet reflètera notre préoccupation et notre refus d’admettre que l’Estonie serait à l’origine de cette crise?

Hon. Allan Rock (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, if the concern my friend has is not for constitutionality but for consistency, then perhaps he can begin by explaining how it is that his colleague at this end of the bench asked me 10 minutes ago how could I dare countenance the payment of money to a claimant in an action against the crown and now he seems to be suggesting that instead of passing Bill C-28 we should be paying out money to the claimants in relation to constitutionality. [Translation] Mr. Gilles Duceppe (Laurier-Sainte-Marie, BQ): Mr. Speaker, the Minister of Justice did not really answer the question put by my colleague, the member for Saint-Hubert, a few moments ago.
[Français] M. Gilles Duceppe (Laurier-Sainte-Marie, BQ): Monsieur le Président, le ministre de la Justice n'a pas vraiment répondu à la question de ma collègue de Saint-Hubert, il y a quelques instants.