Therefore I do not follow the logic that seems to be current, which is that because the House of Commons has decided to do something with their standing orders, that it follows that the Senate — a separate chamber, a different chamber, which is independent and self-standing — would pass standing orders that would apply in the Senate, and that would be the same as the ones they have created in the House of Commons.
Je ne comprends donc pas le raisonnement apparemment répandu voulant que, parce que la Chambre des communes a décidé de modifier son Règlement, le Sénat — une institution séparée, différente, indépendante et autonome — adopte pour lui-même un Règlement identique à celui qui a été établi à la Chambre des communes.
