Bill C-66 will not impose a general ban on the use of replacement workers as requested by the Bloc in its Motion No. 40 and by the NDP in its Motion No. 38. Nevertheless, the code will no
t be silent on this matter as the Reform Party proposes in its MotionNo. 37. It is important to mention that the unions and employers subject to the Canada La
bour Code, although deeply divided on the regulation of the use of r
eplacement workers, recognized in their submission ...[+++]s to the task force that the use of replacement workers was not a legitimate practice if its purpose was to get rid of union representation or undermine the role of the union rather than to achieve an acceptable collective agreement.
Le projet de loi C-66 n'imposera pas une interdiction générale du recours aux services de travailleurs de remplacement, comme l'a exigé le Bloc dans sa motion no 40 et comme l'a exigé le NPD dans sa motion no 38. Néanmoins, le Code du travail ne demeurera pas muet à ce sujet, comme le Parti réformiste le propose dans sa motion no 37.