Vertaling van "reasonable factual foundation " (Engels → Frans) :

TERMINOLOGIE

detailed factual statement (of the reasons)
exposé factuel détaillé des raisons

detailed factual statement of the reasons
exposé factuel détaillé des raisons

IN-CONTEXT TRANSLATIONS

Second, do the government's reasons rely upon a reasonable factual foundation?
Deuxièmement, les motifs invoqués par le gouvernement ont-ils un fondement factuel raisonnable?

Governments are entitled to reject or modify commission recommendations provided—and again I want to go to the principles, because they are very important principles and broaden the P.E.I. reference case—firstly, they have articulated a legitimate reason for doing so; secondly, the government's reasons rely upon a reasonable factual foundation; thirdly, it can be shown that, viewed globally and with deference to the government's opinion, the commission process has been respected and the purposes of the commission, namely preserving judicial independence and depoliticizing the setting of judicial remuneration, have been achieved.
Les gouvernements ont le droit de rejeter ou de modifier des recommandations de la commission en respectant des principes sur lesquels j'insiste, parce qu'ils sont très importants et qu'ils élargissent la portée du renvoi sur les juges de l'Île-du-Prince-Édouard. D'abord, les gouvernements doivent donner des raisons légitimes à leur décision.

The Court set out a three-part test for assessing the rationality of a government’s departure from a judicial compensation commission’s recommendations: 1) whether the government has articulated a legitimate reason (reasons that are complete and provided in a meaningful way) for departing from the commission’s recommendations; 2) whether the government’s reasons rely upon a reasonable factual foundation; and 3) whether, viewed globally and with deference, the commission process has been respected and the purposes of the commission (preserving judicial independence and depoliticizing the setting of judicial remuneration) have been achieved.
La Cour a décrit une analyse en trois étapes pour évaluer la rationalité du refus d’un gouvernement : 1) A‑t‑il justifié par un motif légitime (c.-à-d. complet et concret) sa décision de s’écarter des recommandations de la commission? 2) Les motifs invoqués ont-ils un fondement factuel raisonnable?

(2) Do the government’s reasons rely upon a reasonable factual foundation? and
(2) Les motifs invoqués par le gouvernement ont-ils un fondement factuel raisonnable?

The Court set out a three-part test for assessing the rationality of a government’s departure from a judicial compensation commission’s recommendations: 1) whether the government has articulated a legitimate reason (reasons that are complete and provided in a meaningful way) for departing from the commission’s recommendations; 2) whether the government’s reasons rely upon a reasonable factual foundation; and 3) whether, viewed globally and with deference, the commission process has been respected and the purposes of the commission (preserving judicial independence and depoliticizing the setting of judicial remuneration) have been achieved.
La Cour a énoncé un triple critère pour évaluer le caractère raisonnable du refus d’un gouvernement : 1) A t il justifié par un motif légitime (c.-à-d. complet et concret) sa décision de s’écarter des recommandations de la commission? 2) Les motifs invoqués ont-ils un fondement factuel raisonnable?