Traduction de «lawyers association intervener » (Anglais → Français) :

TERMINOLOGIE

NB Criminal Defence Lawyers Association [ New Brunswick Criminal Defence Lawyers Association ]
Association des juristes de la défense criminelle du Nouveau-Brunswick

NB Trial Lawyers' Association [ New Brunswick Trial Lawyers' Association ]
Association des juristes aux tribunaux du NB [ Association des juristes aux tribunaux du Nouveau-Brunswick ]

professional society [ doctors' association | lawyers' association ]
ordre professionnel [ ordre des avocats | ordre des médecins ]

Canadian Lawyers for International Human Rights [ Canadian Lawyers Association for International Human Rights ]
Juristes canadiens pour les droits de la personne dans le monde [ CLAIHR | Association des juristes canadiens pour le respect des d roits de la personne dans le monde ]

European Company Lawyers Association | ECLA [Abbr.]
Association européenne des juristes d'entreprise | AEJE [Abbr.]

Black Lawyers Association | BLA [Abbr.]
Association des avocats noirs | BLA [Abbr.]

European Women Lawyers' Association | EWLA [Abbr.]
Association européenne des femmes juristes | AEFJ [Abbr.]

Association of Swiss Corporate Lawyers
Association Suisse des Juristes d'Entreprises

TRADUCTIONS EN CONTEXTE

The European Company Lawyers Association, intervener at first instance, and Ireland, intervener before the Court, have argued that by the judgment under appeal the General Court infringed the right to property and professional freedom. It must be observed that Akzo and Akcros did not raise those pleas at first instance.
La European Company Lawyers Association, partie intervenante en première instance, et l’Irlande, partie intervenante devant la Cour, ayant fait valoir que, par l’arrêt attaqué, le Tribunal a violé le droit de la propriété et la liberté professionnelle, il y a lieu de constater qu’Akzo et Akcros n’ont pas soulevé lesdits moyens en première instance.

The European Company Lawyers Association, intervener at first instance, claims that the Court should:
La European Company Lawyers Association, partie intervenante en première instance, demande à la Cour:

Another piece that the Supreme Court quoted was the intervener, the Criminal Lawyers Association, and I think this is really interesting:
La Cour suprême a également cité l'intervenante de la Criminal Lawyers Association. À mon avis, cet extrait est fort intéressant:

In this regard, we agree with the observations of the intervener Criminal Lawyers’ Association”.
À cet égard, nous retenons les observations suivantes de l’intervenante la Criminal Lawyers Association ».

Interveners in support of the applicant: The Computing Technology Industry Association, Inc., (Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, United States) (represented by: G. van Gerven and T. Franchoo, lawyers); and Association for Competitive Technology, Inc., (Washington DC, United States) (represented: initially by D. Went and H. Pearson, Solicitors and subsequently by H. Mercer QC)
Parties intervenantes au soutien de la partie requérante: The Computing Technology Industry Association, Inc (Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, États-Unis) (représentants: G. van Gerven et T. Franchoo, avocats); et Association for Competitive Technology, Inc (Washington, DC, États-Unis) (représentants: initialement D. Went et H. Pearson, solicitors, puis H. Mercer, QC)

The Ontario-based Criminal Lawyers’ Association (CLA) supports certain initiatives in the bill – such as facilitation of electronic filing of documents and remote court appearances, establishing a guilty plea inquiry procedure, and enabling Attorneys General more flexibility in intervening in private prosecutions – and does not take issue with the notion of requiring advance notice of expert testimony (27) However, both the CLA and the Association in Defence of the Wrongfully Convicted (AIDWYC) oppose any new restrictions on the availability of preliminary inquiries (28) These groups believe that, in addition to its principal function of screening out or reducing charges which the evidence does not support, the preliminary inquiry continues to perform a useful role in permitting the accused to obtain further information, assess the strength of witnesses, and generally test the strength of the prosecution’s case before trial (29) In fact, the CLA advocates enhancing the screening role of the preliminary inquiry by raising the standard for committing an accused for trial and enabling the inquiry judge to weigh evidence and exclude evidence which would not be admissible at trial (30)
La Criminal Lawyers’ Association (CLA) de l’Ontario appuie certaines initiatives du projet de loi – facilitation du dépôt électronique de documents et de la comparution à distance devant le tribunal, établissement d’une procédure d’enquête relative au plaidoyer de culpabilité et plus grande possibilité d’intervention des procureurs généraux dans les poursuites privées – et ne conteste pas la notion d’exiger préavis de témoignage d’expert(27). Toutefois, et la CLA et l’Association in Defence of the Wrongfully Convicted s’opposent à toute nouvelle restriction de la possibilité d’enquêtes préliminaires(28).

The Ontario-based Criminal Lawyers’ Association (CLA) supports certain initiatives in the bill – such as facilitation of electronic filing of documents and remote court appearances, establishing a guilty plea inquiry procedure, and enabling Attorneys General more flexibility in intervening in private prosecutions – and does not take issue with the notion of requiring advance notice of expert testimony (67) However, both the CLA and the Association in Defence of the Wrongfully Convicted (AIDWYC) oppose any new restrictions on the availability of preliminary inquiries (68) These groups believe that, in addition to its principal function of screening out or reducing charges which the evidence does not support, the preliminary inquiry continues to perform a useful role in permitting the accused to obtain further information, assess the strength of witnesses, and generally test the strength of the prosecution’s case before trial (69) In fact, the CLA advocates enhancing the screening role of the preliminary inquiry by raising the standard for committing an accused for trial and enabling the inquiry judge to weigh evidence and exclude evidence which would not be admissible at trial (70)
La Criminal Lawyers’ Association (CLA) de l’Ontario appuie certaines initiatives du projet de loi – facilitation du dépôt électronique de documents et de la comparution à distance devant le tribunal, établissement d’une procédure d’enquête relative au plaidoyer de culpabilité et plus grande possibilité d’intervention des procureurs généraux dans les poursuites privées – et ne conteste pas la notion d’exiger préavis de témoignage d’expert(67). Toutefois, et la CLA et l’Association in Defence of the Wrongfully Convicted s’opposent à toute nouvelle restriction de la possibilité d’enquêtes préliminaires(68).

The tradition of the Canadian Transport Lawyers Association, intervening before government agencies on any type of hearings of this nature, has been primarily to provide a perspective on the legal issues that are in front of you and not to try to favour one way or the other.
Lorsque la Canadian Transport Lawyers Association intervient auprès d'une agence gouvernementale lors d'une audience comme celle d'aujourd'hui, elle fournit principalement une opinion juridique à propos des questions à l'étude sans se prononcer en faveur d'une partie ou d'une autre.