Vertaling van "independent researcher could " (Engels → Frans) :

TERMINOLOGIE

independent research
recherche autonome | recherche indépendante

independent research [ free-flowing research ]
recherche indépendante [ recherche autonome ]

portable research [ location-independent research ]
recherche universelle

Seniors Independence Research Program (SIRP): Competition for Programs of Applied Research
Programme de recherches sur l'autonomie des aîné(e)s (PRAA) : concours pour l'établissement de programmes de recherche appliquée

independant basic research
recherche fondamentale libre

IN-CONTEXT TRANSLATIONS

If they are describing experiments or calculations, they must supply enough details that an independent researcher could repeat the experiment or calculation to verify the results.
S'ils décrivent des expériences ou des calculs, ils doivent fournir suffisamment de détails pour qu'un chercheur indépendant puisse reproduire l'expérience ou le calcul afin d'en vérifier les résultats.

- How -- and by whom-- should the lack of career development opportunities following doctoral studies be addressed in Europe, and how could the independence of researchers in carrying out their tasks be fostered?
- Quelle réponse devrait être apportée - et par qui - au manque de possibilités de développement des carrières scientifiques après la formation doctorale en Europe, et comment favoriser l'indépendance des chercheurs dans leur carrière ?

At the time, it was stated that the Member States could have more opportunity to provide their views on the additional information provided by the notifier, that an extensive network of scientific organisations should be formed, that it was essential that any potential divergence between scientific opinions be identified and discussed, that it was essential that systematic and independent research be conducted on the risks, and that independent researchers should be given access to all relevant material.
A l’époque, il a été précisé que les Etats membres pourraient renforcer leurs possibilités de donner leur avis sur les informations complémentaires fournies par le pétitionnaire; qu’un large réseau d’organismes scientifiques devait être mis en place ; qu’il était indispensable que les sources potentielles de divergences entre avis scientifiques puissent être identifiées et discutées ; qu’il était indispensable que les risques fassent l’objet d’une recherche systématique et indépendante, et que les chercheurs indépendants aient accès à tous les documents pertinents.

14. Welcomes, in the ‘Ideas’ chapter, promising results obtained by the European Research Council (ERC) and its role aimed at enhancing the visibility and attractiveness of European research; regrets the lack of private sector participation and involvement in the ERC; calls on the Commission to increase funding for the ERC (which will also increase the success rate), as well as to assess the options for further improving its structures and mechanisms, including making the ERC an independent legal entity with decision-making power, directly responsible for its own scientific strategy and administrative management, which could also be used as a pilot for greater independence of other funding agencies for RD and innovation; supports greater transparency in the process of the appointment of the Scientific Council and in the composition of the review panels; recommends that the ERC retains a strong support for individual excellent scientists; however, calls on the ERC to also provide a possibility for support of team-based projects, always provided that such projects are formed through bottom-up processes;
14. se félicite, dans le volet «Idées», des résultats prometteurs obtenus par le Conseil européen de la recherche (ERC) et de son rôle visant à renforcer la visibilité et l'attractivité de la recherche européenne; regrette le manque de participation et d'association du secteur privé à l'ERC; invite la Commission à accroître le financement de l'ERC (ce qui accroîtra également le taux de succès) et à évaluer les possibilités de poursuivre l'amélioration des structures et des mécanismes de l'ERC, notamment en faisant de celui-ci une entité juridique indépendante dotée d'un pouvoir de décision, directement responsable de sa propre stratégie scientifique et gestion administrative, qu'il serait possible d'utiliser comme un pilote pour accroître l'indépendance des autres agences de financement pour la RD et l'innovation; plaide en faveur d'une plus grande transparence dans la procédure de nomination du Conseil scientifique et dans la composition des panels d'examen; recommande que l'ERC continue de bénéficier d'un soutien solide pour les scientifiques d'excellence; appelle cependant l'ERC à proposer également un soutien aux projets en équipe, en veillant en permanence à ce que ces projets soient mis en place au travers de procédures ascendantes,

14. Welcomes, in the ‘Ideas’ chapter, promising results obtained by the European Research Council (ERC) and its role aimed at enhancing the visibility and attractiveness of European research; regrets the lack of private sector participation and involvement in the ERC; calls on the Commission to increase funding for the ERC (which will also increase the success rate), as well as to assess the options for further improving its structures and mechanisms, including making the ERC an independent legal entity with decision-making power, directly responsible for its own scientific strategy and administrative management, which could also be used as a pilot for greater independence of other funding agencies for RD and innovation; supports greater transparency in the process of the appointment of the Scientific Council and in the composition of the review panels; recommends that the ERC retains a strong support for individual excellent scientists; however, calls on the ERC to also provide a possibility for support of team-based projects, always provided that such projects are formed through bottom-up processes;
14. se félicite, dans le volet "Idées", des résultats prometteurs obtenus par le Conseil européen de la recherche (ERC) et de son rôle visant à renforcer la visibilité et l'attractivité de la recherche européenne; regrette le manque de participation et d'association du secteur privé à l'ERC; invite la Commission à accroître le financement de l'ERC (ce qui accroîtra également le taux de succès) et à évaluer les possibilités de poursuivre l'amélioration des structures et des mécanismes de l'ERC, notamment en faisant de celui-ci une entité juridique indépendante dotée d'un pouvoir de décision, directement responsable de sa propre stratégie scientifique et gestion administrative, qu'il serait possible d'utiliser comme un pilote pour accroître l'indépendance des autres agences de financement pour la RD et l'innovation; plaide en faveur d'une plus grande transparence dans la procédure de nomination du Conseil scientifique et dans la composition des panels d'examen; recommande que l'ERC continue de bénéficier d'un soutien solide pour les scientifiques d'excellence; appelle cependant l'ERC à proposer également un soutien aux projets en équipe, en veillant en permanence à ce que ces projets soient mis en place au travers de procédures ascendantes,

The New York Times reported that 23 U.S. scientists recently signed a letter to the Environmental Protection Agency declaring that no truly independent research on GMOs could be conducted on many critical questions, partly because they were not allowed to even grow samples due to the fact that holders of the patents would not allow independent scientists to grow samples to test the impact.
Le New York Times rapportait que 23 scientifiques américains avaient signé une lettre adressée à l’Environmental Protection Agency, dans laquelle ils déclaraient qu’aucune recherche vraiment indépendante n’avait pu être menée sur les OGM et un grand nombre de leurs aspects critiques, en partie parce qu’ils n’étaient même pas autorisés à cultiver des échantillons du fait que les détenteurs de brevets n’autorisaient pas les scientifiques indépendants à cultiver des échantillons de ces cultures pour vérifier leur impact.

Such a mechanism could take the form of a body which would, independently of the national regulatory authority and service providers, carry out research into consumer-related issues, such as consumer behaviour and mechanisms for changing suppliers, and which would operate in a transparent manner and contribute to the existing mechanisms for stakeholder consultation.
Celui-ci pourrait prendre la forme d’un organisme qui, indépendamment de l’autorité réglementaire nationale ainsi que des fournisseurs de services, mènerait des recherches sur les questions liées aux consommateurs, telles que les comportements des consommateurs et les mécanismes de changement de fournisseur, opérerait dans la transparence et contribuerait aux mécanismes existants de consultation des parties intéressées.

A further advantage of an independent foundation as compared to the research framework programme is the fact that, in principle, such a foundation could make swift and unbureaucratic decisions as to who should get funding, and how much. Relevance and quality must be the criteria for research, not accounting considerations.
Par rapport au Programme-cadre pour la recherche, une Fondation indépendante présente l'avantage de pouvoir décider rapidement et sans excès de bureaucratie de l'affectation et du montant des fonds qui seront alloués. Ce qu'il faut prendre en considération, c'est la pertinence et la qualité de la recherche et non l'orthodoxie comptable. En effet, ce qui convient aux comptables ne convient pas nécessairement aux scientifiques.

Recalls its conclusion of 29 April 1993, according to which detailed criteria and mechanisms should be established for cost-effective implementation and improved management of the Framework Programme in order to ensure that its objectives are fully met; reaffirms also its emphasis on the need for the improvement of procedures for systematic, independent and timely evaluation of the Framework Programme; 2. Welcomes in this respect the initiatives undertaken by the Commission with a view to improving the management of the EC research programmes and encourages the Commission to develop further such initiatives in time for the implementation of the Fourth Framework Programme; 3. Emphasizes that procedures and tools for programme implementation should as far as possible be simplified and harmonized in order to facilitate participation in Community research programmes, particularly by SMEs, and to allow for smooth, transparent and timely implementation of the Framework Programme; welcomes in this respect the circulation by the Commission of information bulletins on a regular basis; 4. Would welcome in particular, without prejudice to the quality and transparency of the selection procedure, improvements in specific areas, such as the shortening of delays between deadlines for receipt of proposals and start of selected projects and the provision of information to applicants on non-selected proposals; 5. Takes note of the Commission's intention to assess in further detail the possible benefits and disadvantages of decentralized management and possible further concrete measures that could be taken in this field, so as to enable Council to take a view on this issue as soon as possible; 6. Considers that possible new types of activities, for example thematic networks of excellence, concertation networks and consortia for integrated projects, as proposed by the Commission, need to be clarified further; 7. Reaffirms the importance of the role of programme committees in th ...
Recalls its conclusion of 29 April 1993, according to which detailed criteria and mechanisms should be established for cost-effective implementation and improved management of the Framework Programme in order to ensure that its objectives are fully met; reaffirms also its emphasis on the need for the improvement of procedures for systematic, independent and timely evaluation of the Framework Programme; 2. Welcomes in this respect the initiatives undertaken by the Commission with a view to improving the management of the EC research programmes and encourages the Commission to develop further such initiatives in time for the implementation of the 4th Framework Programme; 3. Emphasizes that procedures and tools for programme implementation should as far as possible be simplified and harmonised in order to facilitate participation in Community research programmes, particularly by SMEs, and to allow for smooth, transparent and timely implementation of the Framework Programme; welcomes in this respect the circulation by the Commission of information bulletins on a regular basis; 4. Would welcome in particular, without prejudice to the quality and transparency of the selection procedure, improvements in specific areas, such as the shortening of delays between deadlines for receipt of proposals and start of selected projects and the provision of information to applicants on non-selected proposals; 5. Takes note of the Commission's intention to assess in further detail the possible benefits and disadvantages of decentralised management and possible further concrete measures that could be taken in this field, so as to enable Council to take a view on this issue as soon as possible; 6. Considers that possible new types of activities, for example thematic networks of excellence, concertation networks and consortia for integrated projects, as proposed by the Commission, need to be clarified further; 7. Reaffirms the importance of the role of programme committees in the m ...

The First Nations could submit the claim and a commission could provide independent research to try to provide some efficiencies and economies of scale.
Les Premières nations pourraient déposer une revendication et une commission ferait des recherches indépendantes, ce qui donnera un meilleur rendement et des économies d'échelle.