The ruling I made at that time was only to say that I had no information before me, aside from the statements from the hon. member for Bourassa and, I believe, the hon. member for Ottawa South that they had heard these comments in the House, and that I had checked the record and could find nothing on the record which indicated that to me.
La décision que j'ai alors rendue était que je ne disposais que des déclarations du député de Bourassa et, je crois, du député d'Ottawa-Sud, qui ont affirmé avoir entendu les paroles prononcées à la Chambre.